From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f70.google.com (mail-pl0-f70.google.com [209.85.160.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4479E6B0003 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:31:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl0-f70.google.com with SMTP id d9-v6so1388636plj.4 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 06:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org. [198.145.29.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y9si9666201pgr.180.2018.04.16.06.31.02 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 06:31:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:30:58 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 015/161] printk: Add console owner and waiter logic to load balance console writes Message-ID: <20180416093058.6edca0bb@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20180415144248.GP2341@sasha-vm> References: <20180409001936.162706-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com> <20180409001936.162706-15-alexander.levin@microsoft.com> <20180409082246.34hgp3ymkfqke3a4@pathway.suse.cz> <20180415144248.GP2341@sasha-vm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Sasha Levin Cc: Petr Mladek , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Cong Wang , Dave Hansen , Johannes Weiner , Mel Gorman , Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , Jan Kara , Mathieu Desnoyers , Tetsuo Handa , Byungchul Park , Tejun Heo , Pavel Machek On Sun, 15 Apr 2018 14:42:51 +0000 Sasha Levin wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 10:22:46AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > >PS: I wonder how much time you give people to react before releasing > >this. The number of autosel mails is increasing and I am involved > >only in very small amount of them. I wonder if some other people > >gets overwhelmed by this. > > My review cycle gives at least a week, and there's usually another week > until Greg releases them. > > I know it's a lot of mails, but in reality it's a lot of commits that > should go in -stable. > > Would a different format for review would make it easier? I wonder if the "AUTOSEL" patches should at least have an "ack-by" from someone before they are pulled in. Otherwise there may be some subtle issues that can find their way into stable releases. -- Steve