From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f69.google.com (mail-it0-f69.google.com [209.85.214.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FFB6B0007 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 10:42:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-it0-f69.google.com with SMTP id a10-v6so6963425itb.1 for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 07:42:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn3nam01on0116.outbound.protection.outlook.com. [104.47.33.116]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d17si7512885ioc.256.2018.04.15.07.42.53 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 15 Apr 2018 07:42:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL for 4.14 015/161] printk: Add console owner and waiter logic to load balance console writes Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 14:42:51 +0000 Message-ID: <20180415144248.GP2341@sasha-vm> References: <20180409001936.162706-1-alexander.levin@microsoft.com> <20180409001936.162706-15-alexander.levin@microsoft.com> <20180409082246.34hgp3ymkfqke3a4@pathway.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20180409082246.34hgp3ymkfqke3a4@pathway.suse.cz> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Petr Mladek Cc: "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Cong Wang , Dave Hansen , Johannes Weiner , Mel Gorman , Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , Jan Kara , Mathieu Desnoyers , Tetsuo Handa , Byungchul Park , Tejun Heo , Pavel Machek On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 10:22:46AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: >PS: I wonder how much time you give people to react before releasing >this. The number of autosel mails is increasing and I am involved >only in very small amount of them. I wonder if some other people >gets overwhelmed by this. My review cycle gives at least a week, and there's usually another week until Greg releases them. I know it's a lot of mails, but in reality it's a lot of commits that should go in -stable. Would a different format for review would make it easier?=