From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@fb.com, Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: introduce NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:56:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180411135624.GA24260@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08524819-14ef-81d0-fa90-d7af13c6b9d5@suse.cz>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:16:08PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> [+CC linux-api]
>
> On 03/05/2018 02:37 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > This patch introduces a concept of indirectly reclaimable memory
> > and adds the corresponding memory counter and /proc/vmstat item.
> >
> > Indirectly reclaimable memory is any sort of memory, used by
> > the kernel (except of reclaimable slabs), which is actually
> > reclaimable, i.e. will be released under memory pressure.
> >
> > The counter is in bytes, as it's not always possible to
> > count such objects in pages. The name contains BYTES
> > by analogy to NR_KERNEL_STACK_KB.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> > Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> > Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> > Cc: kernel-team@fb.com
>
> Hmm, looks like I'm late and this user-visible API change was just
> merged. But it's for rc1, so we can still change it, hopefully?
>
> One problem I see with the counter is that it's in bytes, but among
> counters that use pages, and the name doesn't indicate it.
Here I just followed "nr_kernel_stack" path, which is measured in kB,
but this is not mentioned in the field name.
> Then, I don't
> see why users should care about the "indirectly" part, as that's just an
> implementation detail. It is reclaimable and that's what matters, right?
> (I also wanted to complain about lack of Documentation/... update, but
> looks like there's no general file about vmstat, ugh)
I agree, that it's a bit weird, and it's probably better to not expose
it at all; but this is how all vm counters work. We do expose them all
in /proc/vmstat. A good number of them is useless until you are not a
mm developer, so it's arguable more "debug info" rather than "api".
It's definitely not a reason to make them messy.
Does "nr_indirectly_reclaimable_bytes" look better to you?
>
> I also kind of liked the idea from v1 rfc posting that there would be a
> separate set of reclaimable kmalloc-X caches for these kind of
> allocations. Besides accounting, it should also help reduce memory
> fragmentation. The right variant of cache would be detected via
> __GFP_RECLAIMABLE.
Well, the downside is that we have to introduce X new caches
just for this particular problem. I'm not strictly against the idea,
but not convinced that it's much better.
>
> With that in mind, can we at least for now put the (manually maintained)
> byte counter in a variable that's not directly exposed via /proc/vmstat,
> and then when printing nr_slab_reclaimable, simply add the value
> (divided by PAGE_SIZE), and when printing nr_slab_unreclaimable,
> subtract the same value. This way we would be simply making the existing
> counters more precise, in line with their semantics.
Idk, I don't like the idea of adding a counter outside of the vm counters
infrastructure, and I definitely wouldn't touch the exposed
nr_slab_reclaimable and nr_slab_unreclaimable fields.
We do have some stats in /proc/slabinfo, /proc/meminfo and /sys/kernel/slab
and I think that we should keep it consistent.
Thanks!
>
> Thoughts?
> Vlastimil
>
> > ---
> > include/linux/mmzone.h | 1 +
> > mm/vmstat.c | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > index e09fe563d5dc..15e783f29e21 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ enum node_stat_item {
> > NR_VMSCAN_IMMEDIATE, /* Prioritise for reclaim when writeback ends */
> > NR_DIRTIED, /* page dirtyings since bootup */
> > NR_WRITTEN, /* page writings since bootup */
> > + NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES, /* measured in bytes */
> > NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c
> > index 40b2db6db6b1..b6b5684f31fe 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmstat.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmstat.c
> > @@ -1161,6 +1161,7 @@ const char * const vmstat_text[] = {
> > "nr_vmscan_immediate_reclaim",
> > "nr_dirtied",
> > "nr_written",
> > + "nr_indirectly_reclaimable",
> >
> > /* enum writeback_stat_item counters */
> > "nr_dirty_threshold",
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-11 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-05 13:37 [PATCH 0/3] indirectly reclaimable memory Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: introduce NR_INDIRECTLY_RECLAIMABLE_BYTES Roman Gushchin
2018-04-11 13:16 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-11 13:56 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2018-04-12 6:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-12 11:52 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-12 14:38 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-12 14:46 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-12 14:57 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-13 6:59 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-13 12:13 ` vinayak menon
2018-04-25 3:49 ` Vijayanand Jitta
2018-04-25 12:52 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-25 15:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-25 16:48 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-25 17:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-25 17:23 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-25 15:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-25 16:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-03-05 13:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: add indirectly reclaimable memory to MemAvailable Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:47 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: treat indirectly reclaimable memory as available in MemAvailable Roman Gushchin
2018-03-05 13:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] dcache: account external names as indirectly reclaimable memory Roman Gushchin
2018-03-12 21:17 ` Al Viro
2018-03-12 22:36 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-03-13 0:45 ` Al Viro
2018-04-05 22:11 ` Andrew Morton
2018-04-06 10:32 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-04-13 13:35 ` Minchan Kim
2018-04-13 13:59 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-13 14:20 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-13 14:28 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-13 14:37 ` Johannes Weiner
2018-04-16 11:41 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-16 12:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-16 12:27 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-16 19:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-17 6:44 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-16 13:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-17 11:24 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180411135624.GA24260@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com \
--to=guro@fb.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox