From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mm, slab: reschedule cache_reap() on the same CPU
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 09:00:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180411070007.32225-1-vbabka@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180410081531.18053-1-vbabka@suse.cz>
cache_reap() is initially scheduled in start_cpu_timer() via
schedule_delayed_work_on(). But then the next iterations are scheduled via
schedule_delayed_work(), i.e. using WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
Thus since commit ef557180447f ("workqueue: schedule WORK_CPU_UNBOUND work on
wq_unbound_cpumask CPUs") there is no guarantee the future iterations will run
on the originally intended cpu, although it's still preferred. I was able to
demonstrate this with /sys/module/workqueue/parameters/debug_force_rr_cpu.
IIUC, it may also happen due to migrating timers in nohz context. As a result,
some cpu's would be calling cache_reap() more frequently and others never.
This patch uses schedule_delayed_work_on() with the current cpu when scheduling
the next iteration.
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Fixes: ef557180447f ("workqueue: schedule WORK_CPU_UNBOUND work on wq_unbound_cpumask CPUs")
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
---
mm/slab.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index 9095c3945425..a76006aae857 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -4074,7 +4074,8 @@ static void cache_reap(struct work_struct *w)
next_reap_node();
out:
/* Set up the next iteration */
- schedule_delayed_work(work, round_jiffies_relative(REAPTIMEOUT_AC));
+ schedule_delayed_work_on(smp_processor_id(), work,
+ round_jiffies_relative(REAPTIMEOUT_AC));
}
void get_slabinfo(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct slabinfo *sinfo)
--
2.16.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-11 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-10 8:15 [RFC] " Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-10 14:12 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-04-10 14:17 ` Tejun Heo
2018-04-10 19:40 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-10 19:53 ` Tejun Heo
2018-04-10 20:13 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-10 20:23 ` Tejun Heo
2018-04-11 7:00 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2018-04-11 10:53 ` [PATCH] " Pekka Enberg
2018-04-11 13:41 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-04-12 0:47 ` Minchan Kim
2018-04-13 8:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180411070007.32225-1-vbabka@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox