From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] page cache: Mask off unwanted GFP flags
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:18:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180410151820.GA69325@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180410140223.GE22118@bombadil.infradead.org>
On 04/10, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:45:45PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 05:53:51AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
> > >
> > > The page cache has used the mapping's GFP flags for allocating
> > > radix tree nodes for a long time. It took care to always mask off the
> > > __GFP_HIGHMEM flag, and masked off other flags in other paths, but the
> > > __GFP_ZERO flag was still able to sneak through. The __GFP_DMA and
> > > __GFP_DMA32 flags would also have been able to sneak through if they
> > > were ever used. Fix them all by using GFP_RECLAIM_MASK at the innermost
> > > location, and remove it from earlier in the callchain.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 19f99cee206c ("f2fs: add core inode operations")
> >
> > Why this patch fix 19f99cee206c instead of 449dd6984d0e?
> > F2FS doesn't have any problem before introducing 449dd6984d0e?
>
> Well, there's the problem. This bug is the combination of three different
> things:
>
> 1. The working set code relying on list_empty.
> 2. The page cache not filtering out the bad flags.
> 3. F2FS specifying a flag nobody had ever specified before.
>
> So what single patch does this patch fix? I don't think it really matters.
Hope there'd be someone who does care about patch description though, IMHO,
this fixes the MM regression introduced by:
449dd6984d0e ("mm: keep page cache radix tree nodes in check") merged in v3.15,
2014.
19f99cee206c ("f2fs: add core inode operations) merged in v3.8, 2012, just
revealed this out. In fact, I've never hit this bug in old kernels.
>From the user viewpoint, may I suggest to describe what kind of symptom we're
able to see due to this bug?
Something like:
[ 7858.792946] [<ffffff80086f4de0>] __list_del_entry+0x30/0xd0
[ 7858.792951] [<ffffff8008362018>] list_lru_del+0xac/0x1ac
[ 7858.792957] [<ffffff800830f04c>] page_cache_tree_insert+0xd8/0x110
[ 7858.792962] [<ffffff8008310188>] __add_to_page_cache_locked+0xf8/0x4e0
[ 7858.792967] [<ffffff800830ff34>] add_to_page_cache_lru+0x50/0x1ac
[ 7858.792972] [<ffffff800830fdd0>] pagecache_get_page+0x468/0x57c
[ 7858.792979] [<ffffff80085d081c>] __get_node_page+0x84/0x764
[ 7858.792986] [<ffffff800859cd94>] f2fs_iget+0x264/0xdc8
[ 7858.792991] [<ffffff800859ee00>] f2fs_lookup+0x3b4/0x660
[ 7858.792998] [<ffffff80083d2540>] lookup_slow+0x1e4/0x348
[ 7858.793003] [<ffffff80083d0eb8>] walk_component+0x21c/0x320
[ 7858.793008] [<ffffff80083d0010>] path_lookupat+0x90/0x1bc
[ 7858.793013] [<ffffff80083cfe6c>] filename_lookup+0x8c/0x1a0
[ 7858.793018] [<ffffff80083c52d0>] vfs_fstatat+0x84/0x10c
[ 7858.793023] [<ffffff80083c5b00>] SyS_newfstatat+0x28/0x64
Thanks,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-10 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-10 12:53 [PATCH 1/2] slab: __GFP_ZERO is incompatible with a constructor Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-10 12:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] page cache: Mask off unwanted GFP flags Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-10 13:08 ` Johannes Weiner
2018-04-10 13:09 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-10 13:45 ` Minchan Kim
2018-04-10 14:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-10 15:18 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2018-04-10 13:46 ` Jan Kara
2018-04-10 13:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] slab: __GFP_ZERO is incompatible with a constructor Johannes Weiner
2018-04-10 13:07 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-10 13:40 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-04-10 13:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-04-10 16:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-10 17:30 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-04-10 17:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-10 17:45 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-04-10 17:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-10 20:21 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-04-10 14:21 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-04-10 14:26 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-04-10 15:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-04-10 17:04 ` Christopher Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180410151820.GA69325@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox