From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f72.google.com (mail-pg0-f72.google.com [74.125.83.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A886B0006 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 23:49:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg0-f72.google.com with SMTP id m18so10513200pgu.14 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com. [192.55.52.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6si223919pff.205.2018.03.26.20.49.54 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:49:36 -0700 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 21/24] perf tools: Add support for the SPF perf event Message-ID: <20180327034936.GO13724@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <1520963994-28477-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1520963994-28477-22-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: David Rientjes Cc: Laurent Dufour , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill@shutemov.name, mhocko@kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox , benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, Will Deacon , Sergey Senozhatsky , Andrea Arcangeli , Alexei Starovoitov , kemi.wang@intel.com, sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com, Daniel Jordan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, bsingharora@gmail.com, Tim Chen , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 02:44:48PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, Laurent Dufour wrote: > > > Add support for the new speculative faults event. > > > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour > > Acked-by: David Rientjes > > Aside: should there be a new spec_flt field for struct task_struct that > complements maj_flt and min_flt and be exported through /proc/pid/stat? No. task_struct is already too bloated. If you need per process tracking you can always get it through trace points. -Andi