From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: kmemleak: wait for scan completion before disabling free
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:26:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180326122611.acbfe1bfe6f7c1792b42a3a7@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180326154421.obk7ikx3h5ko62o5@armageddon.cambridge.arm.com>
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:44:21 +0100 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 04:53:49PM +0530, Vinayak Menon wrote:
> > A crash is observed when kmemleak_scan accesses the
> > object->pointer, likely due to the following race.
> >
> > TASK A TASK B TASK C
> > kmemleak_write
> > (with "scan" and
> > NOT "scan=on")
> > kmemleak_scan()
> > create_object
> > kmem_cache_alloc fails
> > kmemleak_disable
> > kmemleak_do_cleanup
> > kmemleak_free_enabled = 0
> > kfree
> > kmemleak_free bails out
> > (kmemleak_free_enabled is 0)
> > slub frees object->pointer
> > update_checksum
> > crash - object->pointer
> > freed (DEBUG_PAGEALLOC)
> >
> > kmemleak_do_cleanup waits for the scan thread to complete, but not for
> > direct call to kmemleak_scan via kmemleak_write. So add a wait for
> > kmemleak_scan completion before disabling kmemleak_free.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>
>
> It looks fine to me. Maybe Andrew can pick it up.
>
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Well, the comment says:
/*
* Stop the automatic memory scanning thread. This function must be called
* with the scan_mutex held.
*/
static void stop_scan_thread(void)
So shouldn't we do it this way?
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c~mm-kmemleak-wait-for-scan-completion-before-disabling-free-fix
+++ a/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -1919,9 +1919,9 @@ static void __kmemleak_do_cleanup(void)
*/
static void kmemleak_do_cleanup(struct work_struct *work)
{
+ mutex_lock(&scan_mutex);
stop_scan_thread();
- mutex_lock(&scan_mutex);
/*
* Once it is made sure that kmemleak_scan has stopped, it is safe to no
* longer track object freeing. Ordering of the scan thread stopping and
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-26 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-26 11:23 Vinayak Menon
2018-03-26 15:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-03-26 19:26 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2018-03-26 19:27 ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-27 5:29 ` Vinayak Menon
2018-03-27 17:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-03-28 6:51 ` Vinayak Menon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180326122611.acbfe1bfe6f7c1792b42a3a7@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox