From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: memcg: remote memcg charging for kmem allocations
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:49:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180313134902.GW12772@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180221223757.127213-2-shakeelb@google.com>
On Wed 21-02-18 14:37:56, Shakeel Butt wrote:
[...]
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> +static inline struct mem_cgroup *memalloc_memcg_save(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> + struct mem_cgroup *old_memcg = current->target_memcg;
> + current->target_memcg = memcg;
> + return old_memcg;
> +}
So you are relying that the caller will handle the reference counting
properly? I do not think this is a good idea. Also do we need some kind
of debugging facility to detect unbalanced save/restore scopes?
[...]
> @@ -2260,7 +2269,10 @@ struct kmem_cache *memcg_kmem_get_cache(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
> if (current->memcg_kmem_skip_account)
> return cachep;
>
> - memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(current->mm);
> + if (current->target_memcg)
> + memcg = get_mem_cgroup(current->target_memcg);
> + if (!memcg)
> + memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(current->mm);
> kmemcg_id = READ_ONCE(memcg->kmemcg_id);
> if (kmemcg_id < 0)
> goto out;
You are also adding one branch for _each_ charge path even though the
usecase is rather limited.
I will have to think about this approach more. It is clearly less code
than your previous attempt but I cannot say I would be really impressed.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-13 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-21 22:37 [PATCH v3 0/2] Directed kmem charging Shakeel Butt
2018-02-21 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: memcg: remote memcg charging for kmem allocations Shakeel Butt
2018-03-13 13:49 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-03-13 17:55 ` Shakeel Butt
2018-03-15 17:49 ` Michal Hocko
2018-03-15 18:25 ` Shakeel Butt
2018-04-06 17:36 ` [PATCH] " Shakeel Butt
2018-02-21 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] fs: fsnotify: account fsnotify metadata to kmemcg Shakeel Butt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180313134902.GW12772@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox