linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3 update] mm/free_pcppages_bulk: prefetch buddy while not holding lock
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:04:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180313070404.GA7501@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180313033519.GC13782@intel.com>

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:35:19AM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:32:32AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 03/09/2018 12:24 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > +			/*
> > > +			 * We are going to put the page back to the global
> > > +			 * pool, prefetch its buddy to speed up later access
> > > +			 * under zone->lock. It is believed the overhead of
> > > +			 * an additional test and calculating buddy_pfn here
> > > +			 * can be offset by reduced memory latency later. To
> > > +			 * avoid excessive prefetching due to large count, only
> > > +			 * prefetch buddy for the last pcp->batch nr of pages.
> > > +			 */
> > > +			if (count > pcp->batch)
> > > +				continue;
> > > +			pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> > > +			buddy_pfn = __find_buddy_pfn(pfn, 0);
> > > +			buddy = page + (buddy_pfn - pfn);
> > > +			prefetch(buddy);
> > 
> > FWIW, I think this needs to go into a helper function.  Is that possible?
> 
> I'll give it a try.
> 
> > 
> > There's too much logic happening here.  Also, 'count' going from
> > batch_size->0 is totally non-obvious from the patch context.  It makes
> > this hunk look totally wrong by itself.

I tried to avoid adding one more local variable but looks like it caused
a lot of pain. What about the following? It doesn't use count any more
but prefetch_nr to indicate how many prefetches have happened.

Also, I think it's not worth the risk of disordering pages in free_list
by changing list_add_tail() to list_add() as Andrew reminded so I
dropped that change too.


diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index dafdcdec9c1f..00ea4483f679 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1099,6 +1099,15 @@ static bool bulkfree_pcp_prepare(struct page *page)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_VM */
 
+static inline void prefetch_buddy(struct page *page)
+{
+	unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
+	unsigned long buddy_pfn = __find_buddy_pfn(pfn, 0);
+	struct page *buddy = page + (buddy_pfn - pfn);
+
+	prefetch(buddy);
+}
+
 /*
  * Frees a number of pages from the PCP lists
  * Assumes all pages on list are in same zone, and of same order.
@@ -1115,6 +1124,7 @@ static void free_pcppages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int count,
 {
 	int migratetype = 0;
 	int batch_free = 0;
+	int prefetch_nr = 0;
 	bool isolated_pageblocks;
 	struct page *page, *tmp;
 	LIST_HEAD(head);
@@ -1150,6 +1160,18 @@ static void free_pcppages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int count,
 				continue;
 
 			list_add_tail(&page->lru, &head);
+
+			/*
+			 * We are going to put the page back to the global
+			 * pool, prefetch its buddy to speed up later access
+			 * under zone->lock. It is believed the overhead of
+			 * an additional test and calculating buddy_pfn here
+			 * can be offset by reduced memory latency later. To
+			 * avoid excessive prefetching due to large count, only
+			 * prefetch buddy for the first pcp->batch nr of pages.
+			 */
+			if (prefetch_nr++ < pcp->batch)
+				prefetch_buddy(page);
 		} while (--count && --batch_free && !list_empty(list));
 	}
 
-- 
2.14.3

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-13  7:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-01  6:28 [PATCH v4 0/3] mm: improve zone->lock scalability Aaron Lu
2018-03-01  6:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mm/free_pcppages_bulk: update pcp->count inside Aaron Lu
2018-03-01 12:11   ` David Rientjes
2018-03-01 13:45   ` Michal Hocko
2018-03-12 13:22   ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-03-13  2:11     ` Aaron Lu
2018-03-01  6:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/free_pcppages_bulk: do not hold lock when picking pages to free Aaron Lu
2018-03-01 13:55   ` Michal Hocko
2018-03-02  7:15     ` Aaron Lu
2018-03-02 15:34       ` Dave Hansen
2018-03-02  7:31     ` Huang, Ying
2018-03-02  0:01   ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-02  8:01     ` Aaron Lu
2018-03-02 21:23       ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-02 21:25         ` Dave Hansen
2018-03-12 14:22   ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-03-13  3:34     ` Aaron Lu
2018-03-22 15:17       ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-26  3:03         ` Aaron Lu
2018-03-01  6:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mm/free_pcppages_bulk: prefetch buddy while not holding lock Aaron Lu
2018-03-01 14:00   ` Michal Hocko
2018-03-02  8:31     ` Aaron Lu
2018-03-02 17:55     ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-03-02 18:00       ` Dave Hansen
2018-03-02 18:08         ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-03-05 11:41       ` Aaron Lu
2018-03-05 11:48         ` Aaron Lu
2018-03-06  7:55         ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-03-06 12:27           ` Aaron Lu
2018-03-06 12:53             ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-03-02  0:09   ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-02  8:27     ` Aaron Lu
2018-03-09  8:24       ` [PATCH v4 3/3 update] " Aaron Lu
2018-03-09 21:58         ` Andrew Morton
2018-03-10 14:46           ` Aaron Lu
2018-03-12 15:05           ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-03-12 17:32         ` Dave Hansen
2018-03-13  3:35           ` Aaron Lu
2018-03-13  7:04             ` Aaron Lu [this message]
2018-03-20  9:50               ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-03-20 11:31                 ` [PATCH v4 3/3 update2] " Aaron Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180313070404.GA7501@intel.com \
    --to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=kemi.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox