* [PATCH 4/7] HMM: Remove superflous RCU protection around radix tree lookup
[not found] ` <20180306173316.3088458-1-tj@kernel.org>
@ 2018-03-06 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2018-03-06 17:59 ` Jerome Glisse
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2018-03-06 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: torvalds, jannh, paulmck, bcrl, viro, kent.overstreet
Cc: security, linux-kernel, kernel-team, Tejun Heo,
Jérôme Glisse, linux-mm
hmm_devmem_find() requires rcu_read_lock_held() but there's nothing
which actually uses the RCU protection. The only caller is
hmm_devmem_pages_create() which already grabs the mutex and does
superflous rcu_read_lock/unlock() around the function.
This doesn't add anything and just adds to confusion. Remove the RCU
protection and open-code the radix tree lookup. If this needs to
become more sophisticated in the future, let's add them back when
necessary.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: JA(C)rA'me Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
Hello, JA(C)rA'me.
This came up while auditing percpu_ref users for missing explicit RCU
grace periods. HMM doesn't seem to depend on RCU protection at all,
so I thought it'd be better to remove it for now. It's only compile
tested.
Thanks.
mm/hmm.c | 12 ++----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index 320545b98..d4627c5 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -845,13 +845,6 @@ static void hmm_devmem_release(struct device *dev, void *data)
hmm_devmem_radix_release(resource);
}
-static struct hmm_devmem *hmm_devmem_find(resource_size_t phys)
-{
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
-
- return radix_tree_lookup(&hmm_devmem_radix, phys >> PA_SECTION_SHIFT);
-}
-
static int hmm_devmem_pages_create(struct hmm_devmem *devmem)
{
resource_size_t key, align_start, align_size, align_end;
@@ -892,9 +885,8 @@ static int hmm_devmem_pages_create(struct hmm_devmem *devmem)
for (key = align_start; key <= align_end; key += PA_SECTION_SIZE) {
struct hmm_devmem *dup;
- rcu_read_lock();
- dup = hmm_devmem_find(key);
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ dup = radix_tree_lookup(&hmm_devmem_radix,
+ key >> PA_SECTION_SHIFT);
if (dup) {
dev_err(device, "%s: collides with mapping for %s\n",
__func__, dev_name(dup->device));
--
2.9.5
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/7] HMM: Remove superflous RCU protection around radix tree lookup
2018-03-06 17:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] HMM: Remove superflous RCU protection around radix tree lookup Tejun Heo
@ 2018-03-06 17:59 ` Jerome Glisse
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jerome Glisse @ 2018-03-06 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: torvalds, jannh, paulmck, bcrl, viro, kent.overstreet, security,
linux-kernel, kernel-team, linux-mm
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 09:33:13AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> hmm_devmem_find() requires rcu_read_lock_held() but there's nothing
> which actually uses the RCU protection. The only caller is
> hmm_devmem_pages_create() which already grabs the mutex and does
> superflous rcu_read_lock/unlock() around the function.
>
> This doesn't add anything and just adds to confusion. Remove the RCU
> protection and open-code the radix tree lookup. If this needs to
> become more sophisticated in the future, let's add them back when
> necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> Hello, Jerome.
>
> This came up while auditing percpu_ref users for missing explicit RCU
> grace periods. HMM doesn't seem to depend on RCU protection at all,
> so I thought it'd be better to remove it for now. It's only compile
> tested.
Good catch some left over of old logic. I have more cleanup queued up
now that i am about to post nouveau patches to use all this. Thanks for
fixing this.
>
> Thanks.
>
> mm/hmm.c | 12 ++----------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> index 320545b98..d4627c5 100644
> --- a/mm/hmm.c
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> @@ -845,13 +845,6 @@ static void hmm_devmem_release(struct device *dev, void *data)
> hmm_devmem_radix_release(resource);
> }
>
> -static struct hmm_devmem *hmm_devmem_find(resource_size_t phys)
> -{
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
> -
> - return radix_tree_lookup(&hmm_devmem_radix, phys >> PA_SECTION_SHIFT);
> -}
> -
> static int hmm_devmem_pages_create(struct hmm_devmem *devmem)
> {
> resource_size_t key, align_start, align_size, align_end;
> @@ -892,9 +885,8 @@ static int hmm_devmem_pages_create(struct hmm_devmem *devmem)
> for (key = align_start; key <= align_end; key += PA_SECTION_SIZE) {
> struct hmm_devmem *dup;
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - dup = hmm_devmem_find(key);
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> + dup = radix_tree_lookup(&hmm_devmem_radix,
> + key >> PA_SECTION_SHIFT);
> if (dup) {
> dev_err(device, "%s: collides with mapping for %s\n",
> __func__, dev_name(dup->device));
> --
> 2.9.5
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-03-06 17:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20180306172657.3060270-1-tj@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20180306173316.3088458-1-tj@kernel.org>
2018-03-06 17:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] HMM: Remove superflous RCU protection around radix tree lookup Tejun Heo
2018-03-06 17:59 ` Jerome Glisse
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox