From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Directed kmem charging
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:46:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180222134600.5tvizxkroc4oisrd@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180221125426.464f894d29a0b6e525b2e3be@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed 21-02-18 12:54:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 09:18:35 -0800 Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:09 AM, Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote:
> > > Another way to solve this is to switch the user context right?
> > >
> > > Isnt it possible to avoid these patches if do the allocation in another
> > > task context instead?
> > >
> >
> > Sorry, can you please explain what you mean by 'switch the user
> > context'. Is there any example in kernel which does something similar?
> >
> > Another way is by adding a field 'remote_memcg_to_charge' in
> > task_struct and set it before the allocation and in memcontrol.c,
> > first check if current->remote_memcg_to_charge is set otherwise use
> > the memcg of current. Also if we provide a wrapper to do that for the
> > user, there will be a lot less plumbing.
> >
> > Please let me know if you prefer this approach.
>
> That would be a lot simpler. Passing function arguments via
> task_struct is a bit dirty but is sometimes sooo effective. You
> should've seen how much mess task_struct.journal_info avoided! And
> reclaim_state.
Agreed, although from time to time people try to be too creative e.g. with
journal_info and surprising bugs come out of that :).
> And one always wonders whether we should do a local save/restore before
> modifying the task_struct field, so it nests.
>
> What do others think?
Sounds nice to me.
> Maybe we can rename task_struct.reclaim_state to `struct task_mm_state
> *task_mm_state", add remote_memcg_to_charge to struct task_mm_state and
> avoid bloating the task_struct?
Yeah, even better, but then we really need to make sure these things stack
properly.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-22 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-21 3:00 Shakeel Butt
2018-02-21 3:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: memcg: plumbing memcg for kmem cache allocations Shakeel Butt
2018-02-21 3:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm: memcg: plumbing memcg for kmalloc allocations Shakeel Butt
2018-02-21 3:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] fs: fsnotify: account fsnotify metadata to kmemcg Shakeel Butt
2018-02-21 16:35 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-02-22 13:49 ` Michal Hocko
2018-02-22 14:48 ` Jan Kara
2018-02-22 16:44 ` Yang Shi
2018-02-22 19:00 ` Shakeel Butt
2018-02-21 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Directed kmem charging Christopher Lameter
2018-02-21 17:18 ` Shakeel Butt
2018-02-21 17:57 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-02-21 20:05 ` Shakeel Butt
2018-02-22 13:53 ` Jan Kara
2018-02-23 3:16 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-02-21 20:54 ` Andrew Morton
2018-02-22 13:46 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2018-02-23 3:19 ` Christopher Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180222134600.5tvizxkroc4oisrd@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox