linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
	davem@davemloft.net, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	aarcange@redhat.com, yang.s@alibaba-inc.com, mhocko@suse.com,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, rientjes@google.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, guro@fb.com,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [netfilter-core] kernel panic: Out of memory and no killable processes... (2)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 23:35:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180129223522.GG5906@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180129182811.fze4vrb5zd5cojmr@node.shutemov.name>

Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 05:57:22PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 08:23:57AM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > > > vmalloc() once became killable by commit 5d17a73a2ebeb8d1 ("vmalloc: back
> > > > > off when the current task is killed") but then became unkillable by commit
> > > > > b8c8a338f75e052d ("Revert "vmalloc: back off when the current task is
> > > > > killed""). Therefore, we can't handle this problem from MM side.
> > > > > Please consider adding some limit from networking side.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't know what "some limit" would be.  I would prefer if there was
> > > > a way to supress OOM Killer in first place so we can just -ENOMEM user.
> > > 
> > > Just supressing OOM kill is a bad idea. We still leave a way to allocate
> > > arbitrary large buffer in kernel.
> > 
> > Isn't that what we do everywhere in network stack?
> > 
> > I think we should try to allocate whatever amount of memory is needed
> > for the given xtables ruleset, given that is what admin requested us to do.
> 
> Is it correct that "admin" in this case is root in random container?

Yes.

> I mean, can we get access to it with CLONE_NEWUSER|CLONE_NEWNET?

Yes.

> This can be fun.

Do we prevent "admin in random container" to insert 2m ipv6 routes
(alternatively: ipsec tunnels, interfaces etc etc)?

> > I also would not know what limit is sane -- I've seen setups with as much
> > as 100k iptables rules, and that was 5 years ago.
> > 
> > And even if we add a "Xk rules" limit, it might be too much for
> > low-memory systems, or not enough for whatever other use case there
> > might be.
> 
> I hate what I'm saying, but I guess we need some tunable here.
> Not sure what exactly.

Would memcg help?

(I don't buy the "run untrusted binaries on linux is safe" thing, so
 I would not know).

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-29 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-28 17:58 syzbot
2018-01-29  0:20 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-29  7:23   ` [netfilter-core] " Florian Westphal
2018-01-29  8:26     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-01-29 16:57       ` Florian Westphal
2018-01-29 18:24         ` Jan Engelhardt
2018-01-29 18:25         ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-29 18:28         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-01-29 22:35           ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2018-01-30  7:52             ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-30  8:11               ` Florian Westphal
2018-01-30  8:28                 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-01-30  9:02                   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-01-30  9:57                     ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-30 14:01                       ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-30 14:01                         ` Florian Westphal
2018-01-30 14:39                           ` Michal Hocko
2018-02-02 11:41                             ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-01-30 19:27                         ` Andrew Morton
2018-01-31  8:19                           ` Michal Hocko
2018-02-07 17:44                             ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-02-07 19:06                               ` Andrew Morton
2018-02-07 19:15                                 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-01-30  9:51                 ` Michal Hocko
2018-03-23 10:40 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-03-23 11:23   ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180129223522.GG5906@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=yang.s@alibaba-inc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox