From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] free_pcppages_bulk: do not hold lock when picking pages to free
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 16:40:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180124163926.c7ptagn655aeiut3@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180124023050.20097-1-aaron.lu@intel.com>
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:30:49AM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> When freeing a batch of pages from Per-CPU-Pages(PCP) back to buddy,
> the zone->lock is held and then pages are chosen from PCP's migratetype
> list. While there is actually no need to do this 'choose part' under
> lock since it's PCP pages, the only CPU that can touch them is us and
> irq is also disabled.
>
> Moving this part outside could reduce lock held time and improve
> performance. Test with will-it-scale/page_fault1 full load:
>
> kernel Broadwell(2S) Skylake(2S) Broadwell(4S) Skylake(4S)
> v4.15-rc4 9037332 8000124 13642741 15728686
> this patch 9608786 +6.3% 8368915 +4.6% 14042169 +2.9% 17433559 +10.8%
>
> What the test does is: starts $nr_cpu processes and each will repeated
> do the following for 5 minutes:
> 1 mmap 128M anonymouse space;
> 2 write access to that space;
> 3 munmap.
> The score is the aggregated iteration.
>
> https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale/blob/master/tests/page_fault1.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 4093728f292e..a076f754dac1 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1113,12 +1113,12 @@ static void free_pcppages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int count,
> int migratetype = 0;
> int batch_free = 0;
> bool isolated_pageblocks;
> + struct list_head head;
> + struct page *page, *tmp;
>
> - spin_lock(&zone->lock);
> - isolated_pageblocks = has_isolate_pageblock(zone);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&head);
>
Declare head as LIST_HEAD(head) and avoid INIT_LIST_HEAD. Otherwise I
think this is safe
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-24 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-24 2:30 Aaron Lu
2018-01-24 2:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] free_pcppages_bulk: prefetch buddy while not holding lock Aaron Lu
2018-01-24 16:43 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-24 16:57 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-24 18:19 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-24 19:23 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-24 21:12 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-25 7:25 ` [PATCH v2 " Aaron Lu
2018-01-24 16:40 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2018-01-25 7:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] free_pcppages_bulk: do not hold lock when picking pages to free Aaron Lu
2018-02-15 12:06 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-23 1:37 ` Aaron Lu
2018-02-15 12:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-02-15 14:55 ` Mel Gorman
2018-02-23 1:42 ` Aaron Lu
2018-02-05 5:30 ` RFC: eliminate zone->lock contention for will-it-scale/page_fault1 on big server Aaron Lu
2018-02-05 5:31 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] __free_one_page: skip merge for order-0 page unless compaction is in progress Aaron Lu
2018-02-05 22:17 ` Dave Hansen
2018-02-05 5:32 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] rmqueue_bulk: avoid touching page structures under zone->lock Aaron Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180124163926.c7ptagn655aeiut3@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=kemi.wang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox