From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f71.google.com (mail-pg0-f71.google.com [74.125.83.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52666B027A for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:31:36 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pg0-f71.google.com with SMTP id e26so2034967pgv.16 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 07:31:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r6-v6si454480pls.684.2018.01.19.07.31.35 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Jan 2018 07:31:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 16:31:32 +0100 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] mm/memcontrol.c: Reduce reclaim retries in mem_cgroup_resize_limit() Message-ID: <20180119153132.GF6584@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20171220102429.31601-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> <20180119132544.19569-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> <20180119132544.19569-2-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> <20180119133510.GD6584@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180119151118.GE6584@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Shakeel Butt Cc: Andrey Ryabinin , Andrew Morton , Cgroups , LKML , Linux MM , Johannes Weiner , Vladimir Davydov On Fri 19-01-18 07:24:08, Shakeel Butt wrote: [...] > Thanks for the explanation. Another query, we do not call > drain_all_stock() in mem_cgroup_resize_limit() but memory_max_write() > does call drain_all_stock(). Was this intentional or missed > accidentally? I think it is just an omission. I would have to look closer but I am just leaving now and will be back on Tuesday. This is unrelated so I would rather discuss it in a separate email thread. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org