From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
kernel-team@fb.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm 3/4] mm, memcg: replace memory.oom_group with policy tunable
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:00:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180117160004.GH2900@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180117154155.GU3460072@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
On Wed 17-01-18 07:41:55, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, David.
>
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 06:15:08PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> > The behavior of killing an entire indivisible memory consumer, enabled
> > by memory.oom_group, is an oom policy itself. It specifies that all
>
> I thought we discussed this before but maybe I'm misremembering.
> There are two parts to the OOM policy. One is victim selection, the
> other is the action to take thereafter.
Yes we have. Multiple times! The last time I've said the very same thing
was yesterday http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180116220907.GD17351@dhcp22.suse.cz
> The two are different and conflating the two don't work too well. For
> example, please consider what should be given to the delegatee when
> delegating a subtree, which often is a good excercise when designing
> these APIs.
Absolutely agreed! And moreover, there are not all that many ways what
to do as an action. You just kill a logical entity - be it a process or
a logical group of processes. But you have way too many policies how
to select that entity. Do you want to chose the youngest process/group
because all the older ones have been computing real stuff and you would
lose days of your cpu time? Or should those who pay more should be
protected (aka give them static priorities), or you name it...
I am sorry, I still didn't grasp the full semantic of the proposed
soluton but the mere fact it is starting by conflating selection and the
action is a no go and a wrong API. This is why I've said that what you
(David) outlined yesterday is probably going to suffer from a much
longer discussion and most likely to be not acceptable. Your patchset
proves me correct...
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-17 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-17 2:14 [patch -mm 0/4] mm, memcg: introduce oom policies David Rientjes
2018-01-17 2:15 ` [patch -mm 1/4] mm, memcg: introduce per-memcg oom policy tunable David Rientjes
2018-01-17 2:15 ` [patch -mm 2/4] mm, memcg: replace cgroup aware oom killer mount option with tunable David Rientjes
2018-01-17 2:15 ` [patch -mm 3/4] mm, memcg: replace memory.oom_group with policy tunable David Rientjes
2018-01-17 15:41 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-17 16:00 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-01-17 22:18 ` David Rientjes
2018-01-23 15:13 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-17 22:14 ` David Rientjes
2018-01-19 20:53 ` David Rientjes
2018-01-20 12:32 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-22 22:34 ` David Rientjes
2018-01-23 15:53 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-23 22:22 ` David Rientjes
2018-01-24 8:20 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-24 21:44 ` David Rientjes
2018-01-24 22:08 ` Andrew Morton
2018-01-24 22:18 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-25 8:11 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-25 8:05 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-25 23:27 ` David Rientjes
2018-01-26 10:07 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-26 22:33 ` David Rientjes
2018-01-17 2:15 ` [patch -mm 4/4] mm, memcg: add hierarchical usage oom policy David Rientjes
2018-01-17 11:46 ` [patch -mm 0/4] mm, memcg: introduce oom policies Roman Gushchin
2018-01-17 22:31 ` David Rientjes
2018-01-25 23:53 ` [patch -mm v2 0/3] " David Rientjes
2018-01-25 23:53 ` [patch -mm v2 1/3] mm, memcg: introduce per-memcg oom policy tunable David Rientjes
2018-01-26 17:15 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-29 22:38 ` David Rientjes
2018-01-30 8:50 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-30 22:38 ` David Rientjes
2018-01-31 9:47 ` Michal Hocko
2018-02-01 10:11 ` David Rientjes
2018-01-25 23:53 ` [patch -mm v2 2/3] mm, memcg: replace cgroup aware oom killer mount option with tunable David Rientjes
2018-01-26 0:00 ` Andrew Morton
2018-01-26 22:20 ` David Rientjes
2018-01-26 22:39 ` Andrew Morton
2018-01-26 22:52 ` David Rientjes
2018-01-27 0:17 ` Andrew Morton
2018-01-29 10:46 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-29 19:11 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-30 8:54 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-30 11:58 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-01-30 12:08 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-30 12:13 ` Roman Gushchin
2018-01-30 12:20 ` Michal Hocko
2018-01-30 15:15 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-30 17:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2018-01-30 19:39 ` Andrew Morton
2018-01-29 22:16 ` David Rientjes
2018-01-25 23:53 ` [patch -mm v2 3/3] mm, memcg: add hierarchical usage oom policy David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180117160004.GH2900@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox