From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Subject: Re: Hang with v4.15-rc trying to swap back in
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 14:58:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180117145847.ee3137777a42199fd3ea67b8@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1801171423490.5238@eggly.anvils>
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 14:33:21 -0800 (PST) Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Dec 2017, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-12-28 at 09:41 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > I'd guess that since they're both in io_schedule, the problem is that
> > > the io_scheduler is taking far too long servicing the requests due to
> > > some priority issue you've introduced.
> >
> > OK, so after some analysis, that turned out to be incorrect. The
> > problem seems to be that we're exiting do_swap_page() with locked pages
> > that have been read in from swap.
> >
> > Your changelogs are entirely unclear on why you changed the swapcache
> > setting logic in this patch:
> >
> > commit 0bcac06f27d7528591c27ac2b093ccd71c5d0168
> > Author: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > Date: Wed Nov 15 17:33:07 2017 -0800
> >
> > mm, swap: skip swapcache for swapin of synchronous device
> >
> > But I think you're using swapcache == NULL as a signal the page came
> > from a synchronous device. In which case the bug is that you've
> > forgotten we may already have picked up a page in
> > swap_readahead_detect() which you're wrongly keeping swapcache == NULL
> > for and the fix is this (it works on my system, although I'm still
> > getting an unaccountable shutdown delay).
> >
> > I still think we should revert this series, because this may not be the
> > only bug lurking in the code, so it should go through a lot more
> > rigorous testing than it has.
>
> Andrew, neither the fix below (works for me, though I have seen other
> swap funniness, most probably unrelated), nor the reversion preferred
> by James and Minchan (later in this linux-mm thread), was in 4.15-rc8:
> the sands of time are running out...
Yup. I'm actually planning on sending in this one. OK by you?
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: mm/memory.c: release locked page in do_swap_page()
James reported a bug in swap paging-in from his testing. It is that
do_swap_page doesn't release locked page so system hang-up happens due to
a deadlock on PG_locked.
It was introduced by 0bcac06f27d7 ("mm, swap: skip swapcache for swapin of
synchronous device") because I missed swap cache hit places to update
swapcache variable to work well with other logics against swapcache in
do_swap_page.
This patch fixes it.
Debugged by James Bottomley.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1514407817.4169.4.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180102235606.GA19438@bbox
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reported-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/memory.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/memory.c~mm-release-locked-page-in-do_swap_page mm/memory.c
--- a/mm/memory.c~mm-release-locked-page-in-do_swap_page
+++ a/mm/memory.c
@@ -2857,8 +2857,11 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
int ret = 0;
bool vma_readahead = swap_use_vma_readahead();
- if (vma_readahead)
+ if (vma_readahead) {
page = swap_readahead_detect(vmf, &swap_ra);
+ swapcache = page;
+ }
+
if (!pte_unmap_same(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte)) {
if (page)
put_page(page);
@@ -2889,9 +2892,12 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
delayacct_set_flag(DELAYACCT_PF_SWAPIN);
- if (!page)
+ if (!page) {
page = lookup_swap_cache(entry, vma_readahead ? vma : NULL,
vmf->address);
+ swapcache = page;
+ }
+
if (!page) {
struct swap_info_struct *si = swp_swap_info(entry);
_
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-17 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1514398340.3986.10.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
2017-12-27 20:50 ` James Bottomley
2017-12-27 23:26 ` Minchan Kim
2017-12-27 23:34 ` James Bottomley
2017-12-27 23:56 ` Minchan Kim
2017-12-28 17:41 ` James Bottomley
2017-12-28 19:00 ` James Bottomley
2017-12-29 0:00 ` Minchan Kim
2017-12-29 0:45 ` Minchan Kim
2018-01-17 22:33 ` Hugh Dickins
2018-01-17 22:58 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2018-01-17 23:15 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180117145847.ee3137777a42199fd3ea67b8@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox