From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f72.google.com (mail-wm0-f72.google.com [74.125.82.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3546B02C6 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 16:22:18 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm0-f72.google.com with SMTP id 80so23852wmb.7 for ; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 13:22:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y60si31291766wrb.428.2018.01.02.13.22.17 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Jan 2018 13:22:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 13:22:14 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm for mmotm: Revert skip swap cache feture for synchronous device Message-Id: <20180102132214.289b725cf00ac07d91e8f60b@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1514508907-10039-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> References: <1514508907-10039-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Minchan Kim Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, James Bottomley , kernel-team , Christoph Hellwig , Dan Williams , Ross Zwisler , Hugh Dickins , Ilya Dryomov , Jens Axboe , Sergey Senozhatsky , Huang Ying On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 09:55:07 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote: > James reported a bug of swap paging-in for his testing and found it > at rc5, soon to be -rc5. > > Although we can fix the specific problem at the moment, it may > have other lurkig bugs so want to have one more cycle in -next > before merging. > > This patchset reverts 23c47d2ada9f, 08fa93021d80, 8e31f339295f completely > but 79b5f08fa34e partially because the swp_swap_info function that > 79b5f08fa34e introduced is used by [1]. Gets a significant reject in do_swap_page(). Could you please take a look, redo against current mainline? Or not. We had a bug and James fixed it. That's what -rc is for. Why not fix the thing and proceed? There's still James's "unaccountable shutdown delay". Is that still present? Is it possible to see whether the full revert patch fixes it? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org