Re: [PATCH -mm -V2] mm, swap: Fix race between swapoff and some swap operations

[Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>]

On Thu 14-12-17 12:42:46, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 16:17:18 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > > as fast as possible, SRCU instead of reference count is used to
> > > implement get/put_swap_device().  From get_swap_device() to
> > > put_swap_device(), the reader side of SRCU is locked, so
> > > synchronize_srcu() in swapoff() will wait until put_swap_device() is
> > > called.
> > 
> > It is quite unfortunate to pull SRCU as a dependency to the core kernel.
> > Different attempts to do this have failed in the past. This one is
> > slightly different though because I would suspect that those tiny
> > systems do not configure swap. But who knows, maybe they do.
> > 
> > Anyway, if you are worried about performance then I would expect some
> > numbers to back that worry. So why don't simply start with simpler
> > ref count based and then optimize it later based on some actual numbers.
> > Btw. have you considered pcp refcount framework. I would suspect that
> > this would give you close to SRCU performance.
> 
> <squeaky-wheel>Or use stop_kernel() ;)</squeaky-wheel>

well, stop_kernel is a _huge_ hammer. I think we can do much better
without a large complexity. A simple ref counting (or pcp refcounting if
the former has measurable complexity) should do just fine.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>