Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] x86/ldt: Use a VMA based read only mapping

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 01:03:37PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > So here's a second posting of the VMA based LDT implementation; now without
> > most of the crazy.
> > 
> > I took out the write fault handler and the magic LAR touching code.
> > 
> > Additionally there are a bunch of patches that address generic vm issue.
> > 
> >  - gup() access control; In specific I looked at accessing !_PAGE_USER pages
> >    because these patches rely on not being able to do that.
> > 
> >  - special mappings; A whole bunch of mmap ops don't make sense on special
> >    mappings so disallow them.
> > 
> > Both things make sense independent of the rest of the series. Similarly, the
> > patches that kill that rediculous LDT inherit on exec() are also unquestionably
> > good.
> > 
> > So I think at least the first 6 patches are good, irrespective of the
> > VMA approach.
> > 
> > On the whole VMA approach, Andy I know you hate it with a passion, but I really
> > rather like how it ties the LDT to the process that it belongs to and it
> > reduces the amount of 'special' pages in the whole PTI mapping.
> > 
> > I'm not the one going to make the decision on this; but I figured I at least
> > post a version without the obvious crap parts of the last one.
> > 
> > Note: if we were to also disallow munmap() for special mappings (which I
> > suppose makes perfect sense) then we could further reduce the actual LDT
> > code (we'd no longer need the sm::close callback and related things).
> 
> That makes a lot of sense for the other special mapping users like VDSO and
> kprobes.

Right, and while looking at that I also figured it might make sense to
unconditionally disallow splitting special mappings.


--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -2698,6 +2698,9 @@ int do_munmap(struct mm_struct *mm, unsi
 	}
 	vma = prev ? prev->vm_next : mm->mmap;
 
+	if (vma_is_special_mapping(vma))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (unlikely(uf)) {
 		/*
 		 * If userfaultfd_unmap_prep returns an error the vmas
@@ -3223,10 +3226,11 @@ static int special_mapping_fault(struct
  */
 static void special_mapping_close(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 {
-	struct vm_special_mapping *sm = vma->vm_private_data;
+}
 
-	if (sm->close)
-		sm->close(sm, vma);
+static int special_mapping_split(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
+{
+	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
 static const char *special_mapping_name(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
@@ -3252,6 +3256,7 @@ static const struct vm_operations_struct
 	.fault = special_mapping_fault,
 	.mremap = special_mapping_mremap,
 	.name = special_mapping_name,
+	.split = special_mapping_split,
 };
 
 static const struct vm_operations_struct legacy_special_mapping_vmops = {

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>