From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 09/12] x86/mm: Provide pmdp_establish() helper
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:36:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171213163639.7e1fb5c4082888d2e399b310@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171214003318.xli42qgybplln754@node.shutemov.name>
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 03:33:18 +0300 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 04:09:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > @@ -181,6 +182,40 @@ static inline pmd_t native_pmdp_get_and_clear(pmd_t *pmdp)
> > > #define native_pmdp_get_and_clear(xp) native_local_pmdp_get_and_clear(xp)
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > +#ifndef pmdp_establish
> > > +#define pmdp_establish pmdp_establish
> > > +static inline pmd_t pmdp_establish(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > > + unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmdp, pmd_t pmd)
> > > +{
> > > + pmd_t old;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * If pmd has present bit cleared we can get away without expensive
> > > + * cmpxchg64: we can update pmdp half-by-half without racing with
> > > + * anybody.
> > > + */
> > > + if (!(pmd_val(pmd) & _PAGE_PRESENT)) {
> > > + union split_pmd old, new, *ptr;
> > > +
> > > + ptr = (union split_pmd *)pmdp;
> > > +
> > > + new.pmd = pmd;
> > > +
> > > + /* xchg acts as a barrier before setting of the high bits */
> > > + old.pmd_low = xchg(&ptr->pmd_low, new.pmd_low);
> > > + old.pmd_high = ptr->pmd_high;
> > > + ptr->pmd_high = new.pmd_high;
> > > + return old.pmd;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + {
> > > + old = *pmdp;
> > > + } while (cmpxchg64(&pmdp->pmd, old.pmd, pmd.pmd) != old.pmd);
> >
> > um, what happened here?
>
> Ouch.. Yeah, we need 'do' here. :-/
>
> Apparently, it's a valid C code that would run the body once and it worked for
> me because I didn't hit the race condition.
So how the heck do we test this? Add an artificial delay on the other
side to open the race window?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-14 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-13 10:57 [PATCHv4 00/12] Do not lose dirty bit on THP pages Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-12-13 10:57 ` [PATCHv4 01/12] asm-generic: Provide generic_pmdp_establish() Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-12-13 10:57 ` [PATCHv4 02/12] arc: Use generic_pmdp_establish as pmdp_establish Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-12-13 10:57 ` [PATCHv4 03/12] arm/mm: Provide pmdp_establish() helper Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-12-13 10:57 ` [PATCHv4 04/12] arm64: " Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-12-13 10:57 ` [PATCHv4 05/12] mips: Use generic_pmdp_establish as pmdp_establish Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-12-13 10:57 ` [PATCHv4 06/12] powerpc/mm: update pmdp_invalidate to return old pmd value Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-12-13 10:57 ` [PATCHv4 07/12] s390/mm: Modify pmdp_invalidate to return old value Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-12-13 10:57 ` [PATCHv4 08/12] sparc64: Update pmdp_invalidate() to return old pmd value Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-12-14 0:06 ` Andrew Morton
2017-12-13 10:57 ` [PATCHv4 09/12] x86/mm: Provide pmdp_establish() helper Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-12-14 0:09 ` Andrew Morton
2017-12-14 0:33 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-12-14 0:36 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2017-12-14 0:42 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-12-15 13:49 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-12-13 10:57 ` [PATCHv4 10/12] mm: Do not lose dirty and access bits in pmdp_invalidate() Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-12-13 10:57 ` [PATCHv4 11/12] mm: Use updated pmdp_invalidate() interface to track dirty/accessed bits Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-12-13 10:57 ` [PATCHv4 12/12] mm/thp: Remove pmd_huge_split_prepare Kirill A. Shutemov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171213163639.7e1fb5c4082888d2e399b310@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox