linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/8] mm, compaction: don't mark pageblocks unsuitable when not fully scanned
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:59:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171213085915.9278-2-vbabka@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171213085915.9278-1-vbabka@suse.cz>

Compaction migration scanner marks a pageblock as unsuitable (via pageblock
skip bit) if it fails to isolate any pages in them. When scanning for async
direct compaction, it skips all pages of a order-aligned block once a page
fails isolation, because a single page is enough to prevent forming a free page
of given order. But the skipped pages might still be migratable and form a free
page of a lower order. Therefore we should not mark pageblock unsuitable, if
skipping has happened. The worst example would be a THP allocation attempt
marking pageblock unsuitable due to a single page, so the following lower-order
and more critical allocation will skip the pageblock.

Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
---
 mm/compaction.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index b8c23882c8ae..ce73badad464 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 	bool locked = false;
 	struct page *page = NULL, *valid_page = NULL;
 	unsigned long start_pfn = low_pfn;
-	bool skip_on_failure = false;
+	bool skip_on_failure = false, skipped_pages = false;
 	unsigned long next_skip_pfn = 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -920,13 +920,14 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 			nr_isolated = 0;
 		}
 
-		if (low_pfn < next_skip_pfn) {
+		if (low_pfn < next_skip_pfn - 1) {
 			low_pfn = next_skip_pfn - 1;
 			/*
 			 * The check near the loop beginning would have updated
 			 * next_skip_pfn too, but this is a bit simpler.
 			 */
 			next_skip_pfn += 1UL << cc->order;
+			skipped_pages = true;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -944,7 +945,7 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
 	 * Update the pageblock-skip information and cached scanner pfn,
 	 * if the whole pageblock was scanned without isolating any page.
 	 */
-	if (low_pfn == end_pfn)
+	if (low_pfn == end_pfn && !skipped_pages)
 		update_pageblock_skip(cc, valid_page, nr_isolated, true);
 
 	trace_mm_compaction_isolate_migratepages(start_pfn, low_pfn,
-- 
2.15.1

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-13  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-13  8:59 [UNTESTED RFC PATCH 0/8] compaction scanners rework Vlastimil Babka
2017-12-13  8:59 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2017-12-13  8:59 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] mm, compaction: skip_on_failure only for MIGRATE_MOVABLE allocations Vlastimil Babka
2017-12-13  8:59 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] mm, compaction: pass valid_page to isolate_migratepages_block Vlastimil Babka
2017-12-13  8:59 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] mm, compaction: skip on isolation failure also in sync compaction Vlastimil Babka
2017-12-13  8:59 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] mm, compaction: factor out checking if page can be isolated for migration Vlastimil Babka
2017-12-13  8:59 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] mm, compaction: prescan before isolating in skip_on_failure mode Vlastimil Babka
2017-12-13  8:59 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] mm, compaction: prescan all MIGRATE_MOVABLE pageblocks Vlastimil Babka
2017-12-13  8:59 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] mm, compaction: replace free scanner with direct freelist allocation Vlastimil Babka
2018-01-23 20:05 ` [UNTESTED RFC PATCH 0/8] compaction scanners rework Johannes Weiner
2018-03-01 10:22   ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171213085915.9278-2-vbabka@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox