From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: changbin.du@intel.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm, thp: introduce generic transparent huge page allocation interfaces
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 15:45:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171207154519.df3f8218f8dbe05f95a2bc42@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512644059-24329-1-git-send-email-changbin.du@intel.com>
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 18:54:19 +0800 changbin.du@intel.com wrote:
> From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
>
> This patch introduced 4 new interfaces to allocate a prepared transparent
> huge page. These interfaces merge distributed two-step allocation as simple
> single step. And they can avoid issue like forget to call prep_transhuge_page()
> or call it on wrong page. A real fix:
> 40a899e ("mm: migrate: fix an incorrect call of prep_transhuge_page()")
>
> Anyway, I just want to prove that expose direct allocation interfaces is
> better than a interface only do the second part of it.
>
> These are similar to alloc_hugepage_xxx which are for hugetlbfs pages. New
> interfaces are:
> - alloc_transhuge_page_vma
> - alloc_transhuge_page_nodemask
> - alloc_transhuge_page_node
> - alloc_transhuge_page
>
> These interfaces implicitly add __GFP_COMP gfp mask which is the minimum
> flags used for huge page allocation. More flags leave to the callers.
>
> This patch does below changes:
> - define alloc_transhuge_page_xxx interfaces
> - apply them to all existing code
> - declare prep_transhuge_page as static since no others use it
> - remove alloc_hugepage_vma definition since it no longer has users
>
> ...
>
> @@ -261,7 +272,10 @@ static inline bool transparent_hugepage_enabled(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> return false;
> }
>
> -static inline void prep_transhuge_page(struct page *page) {}
> +#define alloc_transhuge_page_vma(gfp_mask, vma, addr) NULL
> +#define alloc_transhuge_page_nodemask(gfp_mask, preferred_nid, nmask) NULL
> +#define alloc_transhuge_page_node(nid, gfp_maskg) NULL
> +#define alloc_transhuge_page(gfp_mask) NULL
Ugly. And such things can cause unused-variable warnings in calling
code. Whereas
static inline struct page *alloc_transhuge_page_vma(gfp_t gfp_mask,
struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
{
return NULL;
}
will avoid such warnings.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-07 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-07 10:54 changbin.du
2017-12-07 23:45 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2017-12-08 2:27 ` Du, Changbin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171207154519.df3f8218f8dbe05f95a2bc42@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=changbin.du@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox