* [linux-next:master 2148/2944] lib/find_bit_benchmark.c:115:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'find_next_and_bit'; did you mean 'find_next_bit'?
@ 2017-12-05 12:31 kbuild test robot
2017-12-06 0:09 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2017-12-05 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Clement Courbet; +Cc: kbuild-all, Andrew Morton, Linux Memory Management List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1778 bytes --]
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
head: 7ceb97a071e80f1b5e4cd5a36de135612a836388
commit: e49c614e6b37254b1e7bf55c631ce3cb5e3b6433 [2148/2944] lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()
config: m68k-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
git checkout e49c614e6b37254b1e7bf55c631ce3cb5e3b6433
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=m68k
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
lib/find_bit_benchmark.c: In function 'test_find_next_and_bit':
>> lib/find_bit_benchmark.c:115:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'find_next_and_bit'; did you mean 'find_next_bit'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
i = find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN, i+1);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
find_next_bit
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +115 lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
106
107 static int __init test_find_next_and_bit(const void *bitmap,
108 const void *bitmap2, unsigned long len)
109 {
110 unsigned long i, cnt;
111 cycles_t cycles;
112
113 cycles = get_cycles();
114 for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++)
> 115 i = find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN, i+1);
116 cycles = get_cycles() - cycles;
117 pr_err("find_next_and_bit: %ld cycles, %ld iterations\n", (long)cycles,
118 cnt);
119
120 return 0;
121 }
122
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 45145 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next:master 2148/2944] lib/find_bit_benchmark.c:115:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'find_next_and_bit'; did you mean 'find_next_bit'?
2017-12-05 12:31 [linux-next:master 2148/2944] lib/find_bit_benchmark.c:115:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'find_next_and_bit'; did you mean 'find_next_bit'? kbuild test robot
@ 2017-12-06 0:09 ` Andrew Morton
2017-12-06 8:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2017-12-06 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild test robot
Cc: Clement Courbet, kbuild-all, Linux Memory Management List,
Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 20:31:28 +0800 kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> head: 7ceb97a071e80f1b5e4cd5a36de135612a836388
> commit: e49c614e6b37254b1e7bf55c631ce3cb5e3b6433 [2148/2944] lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()
> config: m68k-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: m68k-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0
> reproduce:
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> git checkout e49c614e6b37254b1e7bf55c631ce3cb5e3b6433
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make.cross ARCH=m68k
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> lib/find_bit_benchmark.c: In function 'test_find_next_and_bit':
> >> lib/find_bit_benchmark.c:115:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'find_next_and_bit'; did you mean 'find_next_bit'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> i = find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN, i+1);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> find_next_bit
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
For some reason m68k doesn't include asm-generic/bitops/find.h from
arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops.h. One for Clement and Geert to puzzle
out, please.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next:master 2148/2944] lib/find_bit_benchmark.c:115:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'find_next_and_bit'; did you mean 'find_next_bit'?
2017-12-06 0:09 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2017-12-06 8:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2017-12-06 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: kbuild test robot, Clement Courbet, kbuild-all,
Linux Memory Management List
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 20:31:28 +0800 kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
>> head: 7ceb97a071e80f1b5e4cd5a36de135612a836388
>> commit: e49c614e6b37254b1e7bf55c631ce3cb5e3b6433 [2148/2944] lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()
>> config: m68k-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
>> compiler: m68k-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-11) 7.2.0
>> reproduce:
>> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>> git checkout e49c614e6b37254b1e7bf55c631ce3cb5e3b6433
>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>> make.cross ARCH=m68k
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> lib/find_bit_benchmark.c: In function 'test_find_next_and_bit':
>> >> lib/find_bit_benchmark.c:115:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'find_next_and_bit'; did you mean 'find_next_bit'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> i = find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN, i+1);
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> find_next_bit
>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> For some reason m68k doesn't include asm-generic/bitops/find.h from
> arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops.h. One for Clement and Geert to puzzle
> out, please.
Oh it does, but only for the CONFIG_CPU_HAS_NO_BITFIELDS=y case.
Which used to be fine, as the code for CONFIG_CPU_HAS_NO_BITFIELDS=n
implemented everything in find.h, until find_next_and_bit() was added.
Thanks, will fix...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-12-06 8:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-12-05 12:31 [linux-next:master 2148/2944] lib/find_bit_benchmark.c:115:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'find_next_and_bit'; did you mean 'find_next_bit'? kbuild test robot
2017-12-06 0:09 ` Andrew Morton
2017-12-06 8:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox