linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lge.com, jack@suse.cz,
	jlayton@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	npiggin@gmail.com, rgoldwyn@suse.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
	pombredanne@nexb.com, vinmenon@codeaurora.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] lockdep/crossrelease: Apply crossrelease to page locks
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 09:58:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171205085837.7oo6j5bp6y3xqope@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171205074517.GA11477@bombadil.infradead.org>

On Mon 04-12-17 23:45:17, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 03:19:46PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > On 12/5/2017 2:46 PM, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > On 12/5/2017 2:30 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 02:16:19PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > > > For now, wait_for_completion() / complete() works with lockdep, add
> > > > > lock_page() / unlock_page() and its family to lockdep support.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Changes from v1
> > > > >   - Move lockdep_map_cross outside of page_ext to make it flexible
> > > > >   - Prevent allocating lockdep_map per page by default
> > > > >   - Add a boot parameter allowing the allocation for debugging
> > > > > 
> > > > > Byungchul Park (4):
> > > > >    lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked locks
> > > > >    lockdep: Apply lock_acquire(release) on __Set(__Clear)PageLocked
> > > > >    lockdep: Move data of CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK from page to page_ext
> > > > >    lockdep: Add a boot parameter enabling to track page locks using
> > > > >      lockdep and disable it by default
> > > > 
> > > > I don't like the way you've structured this patch series; first adding
> > > > the lockdep map to struct page, then moving it to page_ext.
> > > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > I will make them into one patch.
> > 
> > I've thought it more.
> > 
> > Actually I did it because I thought I'd better make it into two
> > patches since it makes reviewers easier to review. It doesn't matter
> > which one I choose, but I prefer to split it.
> 
> I don't know whether it's better to make it all one patch or split it
> into multiple patches.  But it makes no sense to introduce it in struct
> page, then move it to struct page_ext.

I would tend to agree. It is not like anybody would like to apply only
the first part alone. Adding the necessary infrastructure to page_ext is
not such a big deal.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2017-12-05  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-04  5:16 Byungchul Park
2017-12-04  5:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked locks Byungchul Park
2017-12-04  5:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] lockdep: Apply lock_acquire(release) on __Set(__Clear)PageLocked Byungchul Park
2017-12-04  5:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] lockdep: Move data of CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK from page to page_ext Byungchul Park
2017-12-04  5:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] lockdep: Add a boot parameter enabling to track page locks using lockdep and disable it by default Byungchul Park
2017-12-05  5:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] lockdep/crossrelease: Apply crossrelease to page locks Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-05  5:46   ` Byungchul Park
2017-12-05  6:19     ` Byungchul Park
2017-12-05  7:45       ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-12-05  8:58         ` Michal Hocko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171205085837.7oo6j5bp6y3xqope@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
    --cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox