Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] mm: memory_hotplug: Add memory hotremove probe device

[Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 02:29:48PM +0000, Andrea Reale wrote:
>But, at least in my understanding, the implementation is not as
>straightfoward as it looks. If I declare a memory node in the fdt, then,
>at boot, the kernel will expect that memory to actually be there to be
>used: this is not true if I want to plug my dimms only later at runtime.
>So I think that declaring the hotpluggable memory in an fdt memory
>node might not feasible without changes.

On the power arch, we do this today using "linux,usable-memory".

memory@10000000000 {
  device_type = "memory";
  reg = <0x100 0x0 0x0 0x80000000>;
  linux,usable-memory = <0x100 0x0 0x0 0x40000000>;
  :
}

The reg range defines the node, but at at boot, memblocks are only 
created for the linux,usable-memory range. The rest can be hotplugged 
later. YMMV, because this depends on your arch's implementation of 
memory_add_physaddr_to_nid().

>One idea could be to add a new property to memory nodes, to specify 
>what memory is potentially hotplugguable.

Somewhat related, there is already a "hotpluggable" property.

memory@10040000000 {
  device_type = "memory";
  reg = <0x100 0x40000000 0x0 0x40000000>;
  hotpluggable;
  :
}

This is subtly different from the earlier example. This memory IS 
present at boot. The hotpluggable property ensures that it resides in 
ZONE_MOVABLE so it can potentially be removed.

-- 
Reza Arbab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>