From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f197.google.com (mail-wr0-f197.google.com [209.85.128.197]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD4D6B0253 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2017 10:37:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wr0-f197.google.com with SMTP id l4so6038889wre.10 for ; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 07:37:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de. [2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 89si5065927wri.18.2017.12.01.07.37.19 for ; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 07:37:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 16:37:13 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: KAISER: kexec triggers a warning Message-ID: <20171201153713.apdoi6em7c4iynlr@pd.tnic> References: <03012d01-4d04-1d58-aa93-425f142f9292@canonical.com> <84c7dd7d-5e01-627e-6f26-5c1e30a87683@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <84c7dd7d-5e01-627e-6f26-5c1e30a87683@linux.intel.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dave Hansen Cc: Juerg Haefliger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, hughd@google.com, luto@kernel.org On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 07:31:36AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > The only question is whether we want to preserve _some_ kind of warning > there, or just axe it entirely. Right, my fear would be if we keep it, then we'd have to go and whitelist or somehow track those users which are an exception... OTOH, it might be prudent to have a warning to catch such abnormal situations... -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org