From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: JianKang Chen <chenjiankang1@huawei.com>,
mgorman@techsingularity.net, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
xieyisheng1@huawei.com, guohanjun@huawei.com,
wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] mm/page_alloc: fix comment is __get_free_pages
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:17:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171130131706.0550cd28ce47aaa976f7db2a@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171130065335.zno7peunnl2zpozq@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 07:53:35 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
> > mm... So we have a caller which hopes to be getting highmem pages but
> > isn't. Caller then proceeds to pointlessly kmap the page and wonders
> > why it isn't getting as much memory as it would like on 32-bit systems,
> > etc.
>
> How he can kmap the page when he gets a _virtual_ address?
doh.
> > I do think we should help ferret out such bogosity. A WARN_ON_ONCE
> > would suffice.
>
> This function has always been about lowmem pages. I seriously doubt we
> have anybody confused and asking for a highmem page in the kernel. I
> haven't checked that but it would already blow up as VM_BUG_ON tends to
> be enabled on many setups.
OK. But silently accepting __GFP_HIGHMEM is a bit weird - callers
shouldn't be doing that in the first place.
I wonder what happens if we just remove the WARN_ON and pass any
__GFP_HIGHMEM straight through. The caller gets a weird address from
page_to_virt(highmem page) and usually goes splat? Good enough
treatment for something which never happens anyway?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-30 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-27 11:09 JianKang Chen
2017-11-27 11:33 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-29 16:04 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-29 21:41 ` Andrew Morton
2017-11-30 6:53 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-30 21:17 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2017-12-01 7:24 ` Michal Hocko
2017-12-01 11:18 ` Michal Hocko
2017-12-14 14:06 ` Michal Hocko
2017-12-14 20:33 ` Andrew Morton
2017-12-15 9:36 ` Michal Hocko
2017-12-15 20:57 ` Andrew Morton
2017-12-16 11:52 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-06 10:02 ` Michal Hocko
2018-04-06 19:58 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-11-25 7:20 JianKang Chen
2017-11-27 6:22 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171130131706.0550cd28ce47aaa976f7db2a@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chenjiankang1@huawei.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=xieyisheng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox