linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Jiang Biao <jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com, minchan@kernel.org,
	ying.huang@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhong.weidong@zte.com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmscan: try to optimize branch procedures.
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:40:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171128094025.fcnsmafbsp7cjkf6@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1511833785-55392-1-git-send-email-jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn>

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:49:45AM +0800, Jiang Biao wrote:
> 1. Use unlikely to try to improve branch prediction. The
> *total_scan < 0* branch is unlikely to reach, so use unlikely.
> 
> 2. Optimize *next_deferred >= scanned* condition.
> *next_deferred >= scanned* condition could be optimized into
> *next_deferred > scanned*, because when *next_deferred == scanned*,
> next_deferred shoud be 0, which is covered by the else branch.
> 
> 3. Merge two branch blocks into one. The *next_deferred > 0* branch
> could be merged into *next_deferred > scanned* to simplify the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Biao <jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn>

These are slow paths. Do you have perf data indicating the branches are
frequently mispredicted? Do you have data showing this improves
performance?

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-28  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-28  1:49 Jiang Biao
2017-11-28  8:03 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-28  9:19   ` jiang.biao2
2017-11-28  9:31     ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-28  9:46     ` Mel Gorman
2017-11-28  9:40 ` Mel Gorman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171128094025.fcnsmafbsp7cjkf6@techsingularity.net \
    --to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
    --cc=jiang.biao2@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=zhong.weidong@zte.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox