linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: hugetlb page migration vs. overcommit
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 10:21:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171123092149.tnfl2dcswg2iv3s3@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91969714-5256-e96f-a48b-43af756a2686@oracle.com>

On Wed 22-11-17 11:11:38, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 11/22/2017 07:28 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > Why don't we simply migrate as long as we are able to allocate the
> > target hugetlb page? I have a half baked patch to remove this
> > restriction, would there be an opposition to do something like that?
> 
> I would not be opposed and would help with this effort.  My concern would
> be any subtle hugetlb accounting issues once you start messing with
> additional overcommit pages.

Well my current (crude) patch checks for overcommit in the destructor
and releases the page if we are over. That should deal with accounting
AFAICS.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-23  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-22 15:28 Michal Hocko
2017-11-22 19:11 ` Mike Kravetz
2017-11-23  9:21   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-11-27  6:27   ` Naoya Horiguchi
2017-11-28 10:19 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-28 14:12   ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-28 14:12     ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] mm, hugetlb: unify core page allocation accounting and initialization Michal Hocko
2017-11-28 21:34       ` Mike Kravetz
2017-11-29  6:57         ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-29 19:09           ` Mike Kravetz
2017-11-28 14:12     ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] mm, hugetlb: do not rely on overcommit limit during migration Michal Hocko
2017-11-29  1:39       ` Mike Kravetz
2017-11-29  7:17         ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-29  9:22       ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-29  9:40         ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-29 11:23         ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-29 19:52         ` Mike Kravetz
2017-11-30  7:57           ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-30 19:35             ` Mike Kravetz
2017-11-30 19:57               ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-30 20:06                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-29  9:51       ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-29 11:33       ` [PATCH RFC v2 " Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171123092149.tnfl2dcswg2iv3s3@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox