From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lge.com, jack@suse.cz,
jlayton@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
npiggin@gmail.com, rgoldwyn@suse.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
pombredanne@nexb.com, vinmenon@codeaurora.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked locks
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:02:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171116120216.nxbwkj5y3kvim6cj@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1510802067-18609-2-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com>
[I have only briefly looked at patches so I might have missed some
details.]
On Thu 16-11-17 12:14:25, Byungchul Park wrote:
> Although lock_page() and its family can cause deadlock, lockdep have not
> worked with them, because unlock_page() might be called in a different
> context from the acquire context, which violated lockdep's assumption.
>
> Now CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE has been introduced, lockdep can work
> with page locks.
I definitely agree that debugging page_lock deadlocks is a major PITA
but your implementation seems prohibitively too expensive.
[...]
> @@ -218,6 +222,10 @@ struct page {
> #ifdef LAST_CPUPID_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS
> int _last_cpupid;
> #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK
> + struct lockdep_map_cross map;
> +#endif
> }
now you are adding
struct lockdep_map_cross {
struct lockdep_map map; /* 0 40 */
struct cross_lock xlock; /* 40 56 */
/* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) was 32 bytes ago --- */
/* size: 96, cachelines: 2, members: 2 */
/* last cacheline: 32 bytes */
};
for each struct page. So you are doubling the size. Who is going to
enable this config option? You are moving this to page_ext in a later
patch which is a good step but it doesn't go far enough because this
still consumes those resources. Is there any problem to make this
kernel command line controllable? Something we do for page_owner for
example?
Also it would be really great if you could give us some measures about
the runtime overhead. I do not expect it to be very large but this is
something people are usually interested in when enabling debugging
features.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-16 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-16 3:14 [PATCH 0/3] lockdep/crossrelease: Apply crossrelease to page locks Byungchul Park
2017-11-16 3:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked locks Byungchul Park
2017-11-16 12:02 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-11-16 12:48 ` Byungchul Park
2017-11-16 13:07 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-24 3:02 ` Byungchul Park
2017-11-24 8:11 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-24 9:38 ` Jan Kara
2017-11-16 3:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] lockdep: Apply lock_acquire(release) on __Set(__Clear)PageLocked Byungchul Park
2017-11-16 3:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] lockdep: Move data of CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK from page to page_ext Byungchul Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171116120216.nxbwkj5y3kvim6cj@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
--cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox