From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yasu.isimatu@gmail.com, koki.sanagi@us.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, meminit: Serially initialise deferred memory if trace_buf_size is specified
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 15:57:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171115145716.w34jaez5ljb3fssn@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171115144314.xwdi2sbcn6m6lqdo@techsingularity.net>
On Wed 15-11-17 14:43:14, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 03:28:16PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 15-11-17 14:13:29, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I doubt anyone well. Even the original reporter appeared to pick that
> > > particular value just to trigger the OOM.
> >
> > Then why do we care at all? The trace buffer size can be configured from
> > the userspace if it is not sufficiently large IIRC.
> >
>
> I guess there is the potential that the trace buffer needs to be large
> enough early on in boot but I'm not sure why it would need to be that large
> to be honest. Bottom line, it's fairly trivial to just serialise meminit
> in the event that it's resized from command line. I'm also ok with just
> leaving this is as a "don't set the buffer that large"
I would be reluctant to touch the code just because of insane kernel
command line option.
That being said, I will not object or block the patch it just seems
unnecessary for most reasonable setups I can think of. If there is a
legitimate usage of such a large trace buffer then I wouldn't oppose.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-15 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-15 8:55 Mel Gorman
2017-11-15 11:55 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-15 14:13 ` Mel Gorman
2017-11-15 14:28 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-15 14:43 ` Mel Gorman
2017-11-15 14:57 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-11-15 19:17 ` YASUAKI ISHIMATSU
2017-11-16 8:54 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-16 10:06 ` Mel Gorman
2017-11-17 18:19 ` Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-17 21:32 ` Mel Gorman
2017-11-30 3:41 ` Pavel Tatashin
2017-12-06 10:50 ` Mel Gorman
2018-01-31 17:28 ` Koki.Sanagi
2018-01-31 18:24 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-02-05 14:14 ` Masayoshi Mizuma
2018-02-05 15:26 ` Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-21 1:04 ` Andrew Morton
2017-11-30 3:49 ` Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-15 19:49 ` Andrew Morton
2017-11-16 8:39 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171115145716.w34jaez5ljb3fssn@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=koki.sanagi@us.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox