From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/6] mm: introduce MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE, a mechanism to safely define new mmap flags
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 15:51:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171012135127.GG29293@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <150776923320.9144.6119113178052262946.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
Hi,
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index 680506faceae..2649c00581a0 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -1389,6 +1389,18 @@ unsigned long do_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
>
> switch (flags & MAP_TYPE) {
> + case MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE:
> + if ((flags & ~LEGACY_MAP_MASK) == 0) {
> + /*
> + * If all legacy mmap flags, downgrade
> + * to MAP_SHARED, i.e. invoke ->mmap()
> + * instead of ->mmap_validate()
> + */
> + flags &= ~MAP_TYPE;
> + flags |= MAP_SHARED;
> + } else if (!file->f_op->mmap_validate)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + /* fall through */
> case MAP_SHARED:
> if ((prot&PROT_WRITE) && !(file->f_mode&FMODE_WRITE))
> return -EACCES;
When thinking a bit more about this I've realized one problem: Currently
user can call mmap() with MAP_SHARED type and MAP_SYNC or MAP_DIRECT flags
and he will get the new semantics (if the kernel happens to support it). I
think that is undesirable and we should force usage of MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE
when you want to use flags outside of LEGACY_MAP_MASK. So I'd just mask off
non-legacy flags for MAP_SHARED mappings (so they would be silently ignored
as they used to be until now).
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-12 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-12 0:47 [PATCH v9 0/6] MAP_DIRECT for DAX userspace flush Dan Williams
2017-10-12 0:47 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] mm: introduce MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE, a mechanism to safely define new mmap flags Dan Williams
2017-10-12 13:51 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2017-10-12 16:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-16 7:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-16 7:56 ` Jan Kara
2017-10-12 0:47 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] fs, mm: pass fd to ->mmap_validate() Dan Williams
2017-10-12 1:21 ` Al Viro
2017-10-12 1:28 ` Dan Williams
2017-10-12 2:17 ` Dan Williams
2017-10-12 3:44 ` Dan Williams
2017-10-12 0:47 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] fs: MAP_DIRECT core Dan Williams
2017-10-12 0:47 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] xfs: prepare xfs_break_layouts() for reuse with MAP_DIRECT Dan Williams
2017-10-12 0:47 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] fs, xfs, iomap: introduce break_layout_nowait() Dan Williams
2017-10-12 0:47 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] xfs: wire up MAP_DIRECT Dan Williams
2017-10-12 14:23 ` [PATCH v9 0/6] MAP_DIRECT for DAX userspace flush Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-12 17:41 ` Dan Williams
2017-10-13 6:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-13 15:14 ` Dan Williams
2017-10-13 16:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-10-13 17:01 ` Dan Williams
2017-10-13 17:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-10-13 18:22 ` Dan Williams
2017-10-14 1:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-10-16 12:02 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-10-19 6:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-10-16 7:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-16 7:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-16 12:07 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-10-16 17:43 ` Dan Williams
2017-10-16 19:44 ` Dan Williams
2017-10-17 6:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-16 7:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171012135127.GG29293@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox