linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, swap: Make VMA based swap readahead configurable
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:23:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171002072345.sd5zcbk4y34hh3mk@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mv5f8wkj.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>

On Thu 28-09-17 09:02:20, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Hi, Michal,
> 
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> writes:
> 
> > On Wed 27-09-17 23:10:08, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:50:34PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >> > On Wed 27-09-17 22:41:17, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >> > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:22:41PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >> > [...]
> >> > > > simply cannot disable swap readahead when page-cluster is 0?
> >> > > 
> >> > > That's was what I want really but Huang want to use two readahead
> >> > > algorithms in parallel so he wanted to keep two separated disable
> >> > > knobs.
> >> > 
> >> > If it breaks existing and documented behavior then it is a clear
> >> > regression and it should be fixed. I do not see why this should be
> >> > disputable at all.
> >> 
> >> Indeed but Huang doesn't think so. He has thought it's not a regression.
> >> Frankly speaking, I'm really bored of discussing with it.
> >> https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=150526413319763&w=2
> >
> > Then send a patch explaining why you consider this a regression with
> > some numbers backing it and I will happily ack it.
> 
> I still think there may be a performance regression for some users
> because of the change of the algorithm and the knobs, and the
> performance regression can be resolved via setting the new knob.  But I
> don't think there will be a functionality regression.  Do you agree?

I am not sure I understand. One thing is clear though. Your change has
introduced a regression as described by Minchan. And that has to be
resolved no matter what. You cannot expect users will tweak the system
to resolve it or configure their systems in a specific way.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-02  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-21  1:33 Huang, Ying
2017-09-25  5:41 ` Minchan Kim
2017-09-25  5:54   ` Huang, Ying
2017-09-25  6:17     ` Minchan Kim
2017-09-25  6:24       ` Huang, Ying
2017-09-25  6:30         ` Minchan Kim
2017-09-26 13:21 ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-27  1:36   ` Huang, Ying
2017-09-27  5:04   ` Minchan Kim
2017-09-27  7:48     ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-27  8:04       ` Minchan Kim
2017-09-27  8:35         ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-27 13:15           ` Minchan Kim
2017-09-27 13:22             ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-27 13:41               ` Minchan Kim
2017-09-27 13:50                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-27 14:10                   ` Minchan Kim
2017-09-27 14:17                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-28  1:02                       ` Huang, Ying
2017-10-02  7:23                         ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-10-02 15:45                         ` Dave Hansen
2017-10-02 21:49                           ` Andrew Morton
2017-10-06 12:28                             ` huang ying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171002072345.sd5zcbk4y34hh3mk@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox