From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: mhocko@suse.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
rientjes@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz, brouer@redhat.com,
mgorman@techsingularity.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc: apply gfp_allowed_mask before the first allocation attempt.
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 00:16:58 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201709020016.ADJ21342.OFLJHOOSMFVtFQ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170901142845.nqcn2na4vy6giyhm@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 01-09-17 23:11:31, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > We are by error initializing alloc_flags before gfp_allowed_mask is
> > applied. Apply gfp_allowed_mask before initializing alloc_flags so that
> > the first allocation attempt uses correct flags.
>
> It would be worth noting that this will not matter in most cases,
> actually when only the node reclaim is enabled we can misbehave because
> NOFS request for PM paths would be ignored.
>
> > Fixes: 9cd7555875bb09da ("mm, page_alloc: split alloc_pages_nodemask()")
>
> AFAICS this patch hasn't changed the logic and it was broken since
> 83d4ca8148fd ("mm, page_alloc: move __GFP_HARDWALL modifications out of
> the fastpath")
Indeed. Updated patch follows.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> > Cc: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
> > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> > Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
>
> Other than that this looks correct to me.
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
> I wish we can finally get rid of gfp_allowed_mask. I have it on my todo
> list but never got to it.
>
> Thanks!
>
----------
>From b454863bea884158a25460aa29a26c5feb16fe94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 23:11:31 +0900
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm,page_alloc: apply gfp_allowed_mask before the first
allocation attempt.
We are by error initializing alloc_flags before gfp_allowed_mask is
applied. This could cause problems after pm_restrict_gfp_mask() is
called during suspend operation. Apply gfp_allowed_mask before
initializing alloc_flags so that the first allocation attempt uses
correct flags.
Fixes: 83d4ca8148fd9092 ("mm, page_alloc: move __GFP_HARDWALL modifications out of the fastpath")
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 6dbc49e..a123dee 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4179,10 +4179,11 @@ struct page *
{
struct page *page;
unsigned int alloc_flags = ALLOC_WMARK_LOW;
- gfp_t alloc_mask = gfp_mask; /* The gfp_t that was actually used for allocation */
+ gfp_t alloc_mask; /* The gfp_t that was actually used for allocation */
struct alloc_context ac = { };
gfp_mask &= gfp_allowed_mask;
+ alloc_mask = gfp_mask;
if (!prepare_alloc_pages(gfp_mask, order, preferred_nid, nodemask, &ac, &alloc_mask, &alloc_flags))
return NULL;
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-01 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-01 14:11 Tetsuo Handa
2017-09-01 14:28 ` Michal Hocko
2017-09-01 15:16 ` Tetsuo Handa [this message]
2017-09-04 8:22 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-09-04 8:47 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201709020016.ADJ21342.OFLJHOOSMFVtFQ@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--to=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox