From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f72.google.com (mail-oi0-f72.google.com [209.85.218.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BE96B025F for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:06:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi0-f72.google.com with SMTP id b130so535039oii.4 for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 03:06:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp (www262.sakura.ne.jp. [2001:e42:101:1:202:181:97:72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w132si5844739oib.514.2017.08.15.03.06.36 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Aug 2017 03:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <201708151006.v7FA6SxD079619@www262.sakura.ne.jp> Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm, oom: fix potential data corruption when =?ISO-2022-JP?B?b29tX3JlYXBlciByYWNlcyB3aXRoIHdyaXRlcg==?= From: Tetsuo Handa MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:06:28 +0900 References: <201708142251.v7EMp3j9081456@www262.sakura.ne.jp> <20170815084143.GB29067@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20170815084143.GB29067@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, andrea@kernel.org, kirill@shutemov.name, oleg@redhat.com, wenwei.tww@alibaba-inc.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 15-08-17 07:51:02, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > Michal Hocko wrote: > [...] > > > Were you able to reproduce with other filesystems? > > > > Yes, I can reproduce this problem using both xfs and ext4 on 4.11.11-200.fc25.x86_64 > > on Oracle VM VirtualBox on Windows. > > Just a quick question. > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201708112053.FIG52141.tHJSOQFLOFMFOV@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp > mentioned next-20170811 kernel and this one 4.11. Your original report > as a reply to this thread > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201708072228.FAJ09347.tOOVOFFQJSHMFL@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp > mentioned next-20170728. None of them seem to have this fix > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170807113839.16695-3-mhocko@kernel.org so let > me ask again. Have you seen an unexpected content written with that > patch applied? No. All non-zero non-0xFF values are without that patch applied. I want to confirm that that patch actually fixes non-zero non-0xFF values (so that we can have better patch description for that patch). -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org