From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
x86@kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, willy@infradead.org,
ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, sam@ravnborg.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [v6 04/15] mm: discard memblock data later
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:32:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170811093249.GE30811@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502138329-123460-5-git-send-email-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
[CC Mel]
On Mon 07-08-17 16:38:38, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> There is existing use after free bug when deferred struct pages are
> enabled:
>
> The memblock_add() allocates memory for the memory array if more than
> 128 entries are needed. See comment in e820__memblock_setup():
>
> * The bootstrap memblock region count maximum is 128 entries
> * (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS), but EFI might pass us more E820 entries
> * than that - so allow memblock resizing.
>
> This memblock memory is freed here:
> free_low_memory_core_early()
>
> We access the freed memblock.memory later in boot when deferred pages are
> initialized in this path:
>
> deferred_init_memmap()
> for_each_mem_pfn_range()
> __next_mem_pfn_range()
> type = &memblock.memory;
Yes you seem to be right.
>
> One possible explanation for why this use-after-free hasn't been hit
> before is that the limit of INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS has never been exceeded
> at least on systems where deferred struct pages were enabled.
Yeah this sounds like the case.
> Another reason why we want this problem fixed in this patch series is,
> in the next patch, we will need to access memblock.reserved from
> deferred_init_memmap().
>
I guess this goes all the way down to
Fixes: 7e18adb4f80b ("mm: meminit: initialise remaining struct pages in parallel with kswapd")
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com>
Considering that some HW might behave strangely and this would be rather
hard to debug I would be tempted to mark this for stable. It should also
be merged separately from the rest of the series.
I have just one nit below
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 2cb25fe4452c..bf14aea6ab70 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -285,31 +285,27 @@ static void __init_memblock memblock_remove_region(struct memblock_type *type, u
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
pull this ifdef inside memblock_discard and you do not have an another
one in page_alloc_init_late
[...]
> +/**
> + * Discard memory and reserved arrays if they were allocated
> + */
> +void __init memblock_discard(void)
> {
here
> - if (memblock.memory.regions == memblock_memory_init_regions)
> - return 0;
> + phys_addr_t addr, size;
>
> - *addr = __pa(memblock.memory.regions);
> + if (memblock.reserved.regions != memblock_reserved_init_regions) {
> + addr = __pa(memblock.reserved.regions);
> + size = PAGE_ALIGN(sizeof(struct memblock_region) *
> + memblock.reserved.max);
> + __memblock_free_late(addr, size);
> + }
>
> - return PAGE_ALIGN(sizeof(struct memblock_region) *
> - memblock.memory.max);
> + if (memblock.memory.regions == memblock_memory_init_regions) {
> + addr = __pa(memblock.memory.regions);
> + size = PAGE_ALIGN(sizeof(struct memblock_region) *
> + memblock.memory.max);
> + __memblock_free_late(addr, size);
> + }
> }
> -
> #endif
[...]
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index fc32aa81f359..63d16c185736 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1584,6 +1584,10 @@ void __init page_alloc_init_late(void)
> /* Reinit limits that are based on free pages after the kernel is up */
> files_maxfiles_init();
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK
> + /* Discard memblock private memory */
> + memblock_discard();
> +#endif
>
> for_each_populated_zone(zone)
> set_zone_contiguous(zone);
> --
> 2.14.0
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-11 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-07 20:38 [v6 00/15] complete deferred page initialization Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 01/15] x86/mm: reserve only exiting low pages Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 8:07 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:24 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 11:40 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 13:30 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 13:55 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-17 15:37 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 02/15] x86/mm: setting fields in deferred pages Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 9:02 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:39 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 11:43 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 13:32 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 03/15] sparc64/mm: " Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 04/15] mm: discard memblock data later Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 9:32 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-08-11 9:50 ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-11 15:49 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-11 16:04 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:22 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 11:36 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 13:35 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-11 19:00 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 11:34 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 13:39 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 13:42 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 05/15] mm: don't accessed uninitialized struct pages Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 9:37 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:55 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 11:47 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 13:51 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-17 15:28 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-17 15:43 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-15 9:33 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 06/15] sparc64: simplify vmemmap_populate Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 07/15] mm: defining memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 12:39 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:58 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-11 16:06 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:24 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 08/15] mm: zero struct pages during initialization Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 12:50 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:03 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 09/15] sparc64: optimized struct page zeroing Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 12:53 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:04 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 10/15] x86/kasan: explicitly zero kasan shadow memory Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 11/15] arm64/kasan: " Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-08 9:07 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-08 11:49 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-08 12:30 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-08 12:49 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-08 13:15 ` David Laight
2017-08-08 13:30 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 12/15] mm: explicitly zero pagetable memory Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 13/15] mm: stop zeroing memory during allocation in vmemmap Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 13:04 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:11 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 14/15] mm: optimize early system hash allocations Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 13:05 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:13 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 15/15] mm: debug for raw alloctor Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 13:08 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:18 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 11:50 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 14:01 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-15 9:36 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 7:58 ` [v6 00/15] complete deferred page initialization Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:13 ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-11 15:22 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170811093249.GE30811@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox