From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f71.google.com (mail-wm0-f71.google.com [74.125.82.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83C86B02B4 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 07:34:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f71.google.com with SMTP id x64so674758wmg.11 for ; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 04:34:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m63si4884058wma.185.2017.08.07.04.34.31 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Aug 2017 04:34:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 13:34:29 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [RFC] Tagging of vmalloc pages for supporting the pmalloc allocator Message-ID: <20170807113428.GF32434@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <8e82639c-40db-02ce-096a-d114b0436d3c@huawei.com> <20170803114844.GO12521@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170803135549.GW12521@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170803144746.GA9501@redhat.com> <20170803151550.GX12521@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170804081240.GF26029@dhcp22.suse.cz> <7733852a-67c9-17a3-4031-cb08520b9ad2@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7733852a-67c9-17a3-4031-cb08520b9ad2@huawei.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Igor Stoppa Cc: Jerome Glisse , Linux-MM , LKML , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" , Kees Cook On Mon 07-08-17 14:26:21, Igor Stoppa wrote: > On 04/08/17 11:12, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 04-08-17 11:02:46, Igor Stoppa wrote: > > [...] > > >> struct page { > >> /* First double word block */ > >> unsigned long flags; /* Atomic flags, some possibly > >> * updated asynchronously */ > >> union { > >> struct address_space *mapping; /* If low bit clear, points to > >> * inode address_space, or NULL. > >> * If page mapped as anonymous > >> * memory, low bit is set, and > >> * it points to anon_vma object: > >> * see PAGE_MAPPING_ANON below. > >> */ > >> ... > >> } > >> > >> mapping seems to be used exclusively in 2 ways, based on the value of > >> its lower bit. > > > > Not really. The above applies to LRU pages. Please note that Slab pages > > use s_mem and huge pages use compound_mapcount. If vmalloc pages are > > using none of those already you can add a new field there. > > Yes, both from reading the code and some experimentation, it seems that > vmalloc is not using either field. > > I'll add a vm_area field as you advised. > > Is this something I could send as standalone patch? Yes I would start that way and also look at some find_vm_area callers and maybe they can be simplified. The most obvious one being task_struct::stack_vm_area but I have to confess I haven't checked that too deeply. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org