From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@waymo.com>
Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Cliff Spradlin <cspradlin@waymo.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpuset: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled()
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 12:48:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170727124855.aeb97ea9f74af2d3e47e1787@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170727164608.12701-1-dmitriyz@waymo.com>
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 09:46:08 -0700 Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@waymo.com> wrote:
> In codepaths that use the begin/retry interface for reading
> mems_allowed_seq with irqs disabled, there exists a race condition that
> stalls the patch process after only modifying a subset of the
> static_branch call sites.
>
> This problem manifested itself as a dead lock in the slub
> allocator, inside get_any_partial. The loop reads
> mems_allowed_seq value (via read_mems_allowed_begin),
> performs the defrag operation, and then verifies the consistency
> of mem_allowed via the read_mems_allowed_retry and the cookie
> returned by xxx_begin. The issue here is that both begin and retry
> first check if cpusets are enabled via cpusets_enabled() static branch.
> This branch can be rewritted dynamically (via cpuset_inc) if a new
> cpuset is created. The x86 jump label code fully synchronizes across
> all CPUs for every entry it rewrites. If it rewrites only one of the
> callsites (specifically the one in read_mems_allowed_retry) and then
> waits for the smp_call_function(do_sync_core) to complete while a CPU is
> inside the begin/retry section with IRQs off and the mems_allowed value
> is changed, we can hang. This is because begin() will always return 0
> (since it wasn't patched yet) while retry() will test the 0 against
> the actual value of the seq counter.
>
> The fix is to cache the value that's returned by cpusets_enabled() at the
> top of the loop, and only operate on the seqcount (both begin and retry) if
> it was true.
Tricky. Hence we should have a nice code comment somewhere describing
all of this.
> --- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/jump_label.h>
>
> +struct cpuset_mems_cookie {
> + unsigned int seq;
> + bool was_enabled;
> +};
At cpuset_mems_cookie would be a good site - why it exists, what it
does, when it is used and how.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-27 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-26 16:50 [RFC PATCH] mm/slub: " Dima Zavin
2017-07-26 17:02 ` Christopher Lameter
2017-07-26 19:52 ` Dima Zavin
2017-07-26 19:54 ` Dima Zavin
2017-07-27 16:46 ` [PATCH v2] cpuset: " Dima Zavin
2017-07-27 19:48 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2017-07-27 21:41 ` Dima Zavin
2017-07-27 19:51 ` Andrew Morton
2017-07-27 21:41 ` Dima Zavin
2017-07-28 7:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-07-28 8:48 ` Dima Zavin
2017-07-28 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-28 14:05 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-07-28 16:52 ` Dima Zavin
2017-07-31 4:01 ` [PATCH v3] " Dima Zavin
2017-07-31 4:04 ` Dima Zavin
2017-07-31 8:02 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-07-31 9:05 ` Dima Zavin
2017-07-29 4:56 ` [PATCH v2] " kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170727124855.aeb97ea9f74af2d3e47e1787@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=cspradlin@waymo.com \
--cc=dmitriyz@waymo.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox