linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, rientjes@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom_reaper: close race without using oom_lock
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 16:11:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170720141138.GJ9058@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201707190551.GJE30718.OFHOQMFJtVSFOL@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>

On Wed 19-07-17 05:51:03, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 18-07-17 23:06:50, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > Commit e2fe14564d3316d1 ("oom_reaper: close race with exiting task")
> > > guarded whole OOM reaping operations using oom_lock. But there was no
> > > need to guard whole operations. We needed to guard only setting of
> > > MMF_OOM_REAPED flag because get_page_from_freelist() in
> > > __alloc_pages_may_oom() is called with oom_lock held.
> > > 
> > > If we change to guard only setting of MMF_OOM_SKIP flag, the OOM reaper
> > > can start reaping operations as soon as wake_oom_reaper() is called.
> > > But since setting of MMF_OOM_SKIP flag at __mmput() is not guarded with
> > > oom_lock, guarding only the OOM reaper side is not sufficient.
> > > 
> > > If we change the OOM killer side to ignore MMF_OOM_SKIP flag once,
> > > there is no need to guard setting of MMF_OOM_SKIP flag, and we can
> > > guarantee a chance to call get_page_from_freelist() in
> > > __alloc_pages_may_oom() without depending on oom_lock serialization.
> > > 
> > > This patch makes MMF_OOM_SKIP act as if MMF_OOM_REAPED, and adds a new
> > > flag which acts as if MMF_OOM_SKIP, in order to close both race window
> > > (the OOM reaper side and __mmput() side) without using oom_lock.
> > 
> > Why do we need this patch when
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170626130346.26314-1-mhocko@kernel.org
> > already removes the lock and solves another problem at once?
> 
> We haven't got an answer from Hugh and/or Andrea whether that patch is safe.

So what? I haven't see anybody disputing the correctness. And to be
honest I really dislike your patch. Yet another round kind of solutions
are just very ugly hacks usually because they are highly timing
sensitive.

> Even if that patch is safe, this patch still helps with CONFIG_MMU=n case.

Could you explain how?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-20 14:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-18 14:06 Tetsuo Handa
2017-07-18 14:16 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-18 20:51   ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-07-20 14:11     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-07-20 21:47       ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-07-21 15:00         ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-21 15:18           ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-07-21 15:33             ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-23  0:41               ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-07-23  3:03                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-07-24  6:38                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-26 11:33                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-07-26 11:46                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-05  1:02                       ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-08-07  6:02                         ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-08  2:14                           ` penguin-kernel
2017-08-10 11:34                             ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-10 12:10                               ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-08-10 12:36                                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-10 14:28                                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-07-18 14:17 ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170720141138.GJ9058@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox