linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, walken@google.com,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org,
	npiggin@gmail.com, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/16] lockdep: Detect and handle hist_lock ring buffer overwrite
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:50:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170713095052.dssev34f7c43vlok@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170713085746.GH20323@X58A-UD3R>

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 05:57:46PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:14:42AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:07:45AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > Does my approach have problems, rewinding to 'original idx' on exit and
> > > deciding whether overwrite or not? I think, this way, no need to do the
> > > drastic work. Or.. does my one get more overhead in usual case?
> > 
> > So I think that invalidating just the one entry doesn't work; the moment
> 
> I think invalidating just the one is enough. After rewinding, the entry
> will be invalidated and the ring buffer starts to be filled forward from
> the point with valid ones. When commit, it will proceed backward with
> valid ones until meeting the invalidated entry and stop.
> 
> IOW, in case of (overwritten)
> 
>          rewind to here
>          |
> ppppppppppiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
> iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
> 
>          invalidate it on exit_irq
>          and start to fill from here again
>          |
> pppppppppxiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
> iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
> 
>                     when commit occurs here
>                     |
> pppppppppxpppppppppppiiiii
> 
>          do commit within this range
>          |<---------|
> pppppppppxpppppppppppiiiii
> 
> So I think this works and is much simple. Anything I missed?


	wait_for_completion(&C);
	  atomic_inc_return();

					mutex_lock(A1);
					mutex_unlock(A1);


					<IRQ>
					  spin_lock(B1);
					  spin_unlock(B1);

					  ...

					  spin_lock(B64);
					  spin_unlock(B64);
					</IRQ>


					mutex_lock(A2);
					mutex_unlock(A2);

					complete(&C);


That gives:

	xhist[ 0] = A1
	xhist[ 1] = B1
	...
	xhist[63] = B63

then we wrap and have:

	xhist[0] = B64

then we rewind to 1 and invalidate to arrive at:

	xhist[ 0] = B64
	xhist[ 1] = NULL   <-- idx
	xhist[ 2] = B2
	...
	xhist[63] = B63


Then we do A2 and get

	xhist[ 0] = B64
	xhist[ 1] = A2   <-- idx
	xhist[ 2] = B2
	...
	xhist[63] = B63

and the commit_xhlocks() will happily create links between C and A2,
B2..B64.

The C<->A2 link is desired, the C<->B* are not.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-13  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-24  8:59 [PATCH v7 00/16] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park
2017-05-24  8:59 ` [PATCH v7 01/16] lockdep: Refactor lookup_chain_cache() Byungchul Park
2017-05-24  8:59 ` [PATCH v7 02/16] lockdep: Add a function building a chain between two classes Byungchul Park
2017-05-24  8:59 ` [PATCH v7 03/16] lockdep: Change the meaning of check_prev_add()'s return value Byungchul Park
2017-05-24  8:59 ` [PATCH v7 04/16] lockdep: Make check_prev_add() able to handle external stack_trace Byungchul Park
2017-05-24  8:59 ` [PATCH v7 05/16] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park
2017-06-13  0:33   ` Byungchul Park
2017-06-22 23:27     ` Byungchul Park
2017-07-11 16:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-12  2:24     ` Byungchul Park
2017-05-24  8:59 ` [PATCH v7 06/16] lockdep: Detect and handle hist_lock ring buffer overwrite Byungchul Park
2017-07-11 16:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-12  2:00     ` Byungchul Park
2017-07-12  7:56       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-13  2:07         ` Byungchul Park
2017-07-13  8:14           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-13  8:57             ` Byungchul Park
2017-07-13  9:50               ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-07-13 10:09                 ` Byungchul Park
2017-07-13 10:29                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-13 11:12                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-13 11:23                       ` Byungchul Park
2017-07-14  1:41                         ` Byungchul Park
2017-07-14  6:42                         ` Byungchul Park
2017-07-21 13:54                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-25  6:29                             ` Byungchul Park
2017-07-25  8:45                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-13 11:19                     ` Byungchul Park
2017-07-18  1:25             ` Byungchul Park
2017-05-24  8:59 ` [PATCH v7 07/16] lockdep: Handle non(or multi)-acquisition of a crosslock Byungchul Park
2017-05-24  8:59 ` [PATCH v7 08/16] lockdep: Avoid adding redundant direct links of crosslocks Byungchul Park
2017-07-25 15:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-07-26  7:16     ` Byungchul Park
2017-05-24  8:59 ` [PATCH v7 09/16] lockdep: Fix incorrect condition to print bug msgs for MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS Byungchul Park
2017-05-24  8:59 ` [PATCH v7 10/16] lockdep: Make print_circular_bug() aware of crossrelease Byungchul Park
2017-05-24  8:59 ` [PATCH v7 11/16] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to completions Byungchul Park
2017-05-24  8:59 ` [PATCH v7 12/16] pagemap.h: Remove trailing white space Byungchul Park
2017-05-24  8:59 ` [PATCH v7 13/16] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked locks Byungchul Park
2017-05-24  8:59 ` [PATCH v7 14/16] lockdep: Apply lock_acquire(release) on __Set(__Clear)PageLocked Byungchul Park
2017-05-24  8:59 ` [PATCH v7 15/16] lockdep: Move data of CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK from page to page_ext Byungchul Park
2017-05-24  8:59 ` [PATCH v7 16/16] lockdep: Crossrelease feature documentation Byungchul Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170713095052.dssev34f7c43vlok@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox