From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f200.google.com (mail-qk0-f200.google.com [209.85.220.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7EC72802FE for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:50:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qk0-f200.google.com with SMTP id v143so14769275qkb.6 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a36si8612817qkh.261.2017.06.30.12.50.00 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:50:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 15:49:56 -0400 From: Jerome Glisse Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] HMM (Heterogeneous Memory Management) v24 Message-ID: <20170630194956.GB4275@redhat.com> References: <20170628180047.5386-1-jglisse@redhat.com> <960ef002-3cfd-5b91-054e-aa685abc5f1f@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <960ef002-3cfd-5b91-054e-aa685abc5f1f@nvidia.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: John Hubbard Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Dan Williams , David Nellans On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:32:49PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: > On 06/28/2017 11:00 AM, Jerome Glisse wrote: > > > > Patchset is on top of git://git.cmpxchg.org/linux-mmotm.git so i > > test same kernel as kbuild system, git branch: > > > > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~glisse/linux/log/?h=hmm-v24 > > > > Change since v23 is code comment fixes, simplify kernel configuration and > > improve allocation of new page on migration do device memory (last patch > > in this patchset). > > Hi Jerome, > > Tiny note: one more change is that hmm_devmem_fault_range() has been > removed (and thanks for taking care of that, btw). True i forgot to mention that. > > Anyway, this looks good. A basic smoke test shows the following: > > 1. We definitely *require* your other patch, > "[PATCH] x86/mm/hotplug: fix BUG_ON() after hotremove by not freeing pud v3", > otherwise I will reliably hit that bug every time I run my simple page fault > test. So, let me know if I should ping that thread. It looks like your patch > was not rejected, but I can't tell if (!rejected == accepted), there. :) Ingo did pick it up so it should shows in Linus tree soon i expect. Cheers, Jerome -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org