From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "mm: use early_pfn_to_nid in page_ext_init" broken on some configurations?
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 17:42:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170630154224.GA9714@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170630141847.GN22917@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Fri 30-06-17 16:18:47, Michal Hocko wrote:
> fe53ca54270a ("mm: use early_pfn_to_nid in page_ext_init") seem
> to silently depend on CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID resp.
> CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP. early_pfn_to_nid is returning zero with
> !defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID) && !defined(CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP)
> I am not sure how widely is this used but such a code is tricky. I see
> how catching early allocations during defered initialization might be
> useful but a subtly broken code sounds like a problem to me. So is
> fe53ca54270a worth this or we should revert it?
I've dug little bit further. It seems that only s390 and ia64 select
HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID. Much more architectures enabled
HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP though but still
alpha, arc, arm, avr32, blackfin, c6x, cris, frv, h8300, hexagon,
Kconfig, m32r, m68k, mn10300, nios2, openrisc, parisc, tile, um,
unicore32, xtensa do not. I can only see alpha having NUMA and even that
is marked BROKEN. So it seems that this is not a real problem after all.
Still subtle, so I guess we want to have the following. What do you
think?
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index 16532fa0bb64..894697c1e6f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -1055,6 +1055,7 @@ static inline struct zoneref *first_zones_zonelist(struct zonelist *zonelist,
!defined(CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP)
static inline unsigned long early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
{
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA));
return 0;
}
#endif
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-30 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-30 14:18 Michal Hocko
2017-06-30 15:42 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-06-30 15:44 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-04 5:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-07-04 6:51 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-03 11:48 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-07-03 14:18 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-07-04 5:23 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-07-04 9:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-07-04 10:53 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-04 5:17 ` Joonsoo Kim
2017-07-07 12:00 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-07-14 9:13 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-14 9:34 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-07-14 11:35 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170630154224.GA9714@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yang.shi@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox