From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/atomics: don't alias ____ptr
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:14:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170628141420.GK5981@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1706281544480.1970@nanos>
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 03:54:42PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > On 2017-06-28 14:15:18 [+0300], Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> > > > The main problem here is that arch_cmpxchg64_local() calls cmpxhg_local() instead of using arch_cmpxchg_local().
> > > >
> > > > So, the patch bellow should fix the problem, also this will fix double instrumentation of cmpcxchg64[_local]().
> > > > But I haven't tested this patch yet.
> > >
> > > tested, works. Next step?
> >
> > Check all other implementations in every architecture whether there is a
> > similar problem .....
FWIW, as x86 is the only user of atomic-instrumented.h, any similar
issues are unrelated to this series.
That's not to say they don't exist, just that they're orthognal to this.
I've been reworking things for arm64 [1], but there's more cleanup
needed first.
> > But this really want's a proper cleanup unless we want to waste the time
> > over and over again with the next hard to figure out macro expansion fail.
> >
> > First of all, cmpxchg64[_local]() can be implemented as inlines right away.
> >
> > For cmpxchg*(), the situation is slightly different, but the sizeof()
> > evaluation should be done at the top most level, even if we do it further
> > down in the low level arch/asm-generic implementation once more.
> >
> > Something along the lines of:
> >
> > static inline unsigned long cmpxchg_varsize(void *ptr, unsigned long old,
> > unsigned long new, int size)
> > {
> > switch (size) {
> > case 1:
> > case 2:
> > case 4:
> > break;
> > case 8:
> > if (sizeof(unsigned long) == 8)
> > break;
> > default:
> > BUILD_BUG_ON(1);
> > }
> > kasan_check(ptr, size);
> > return arch_cmpxchg(ptr, old, new);
> > }
This'll need to re-cast things before the call to arch_cmpxchg(), and we
can move the check above the switch, as in [2].
> > #define cmpxchg(ptr, o, n) \
> > ({ \
> > ((__typeof__(*(ptr)))cmpxchg_varsize((ptr), (unsigned long)(o), \
> > (unsigned long)(n), sizeof(*(ptr)))); \
> > })
> >
> > That's the first step to cure the actual mess.
> >
> > Ideally we get rid of that whole macro maze and convert everything to
> > proper inlines with actual cmpxchg8/16/32/64() variants, but that's going
> > to take some time. As an intermediate step we can at least propagate 'size'
> > to arch_cmpxchg(), which is not that much of an effort.
>
> And to be honest. That should have be done in the first place _BEFORE_
> adding that atomic-instrumented stuff. I'm tempted to revert that mess
> instead of 'fixing' it half arsed.
Sure.
Let's figure out what this *should* look like first.
If that's sufficiently different to what we have now, we revert this and
clean things up first.
> As a side note, we have files (aside of x86/asm/atomic.h) which include
> asm/cmpxchg.h ...
>
> net/sunrpc/xprtmultipath.c:#include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:#include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
> arch/x86/um/asm/barrier.h:#include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
Ugh. I'd sent out a patch [3] for the first of these a while back, as I
spotted that when experimenting with arm64, but tht got dropped on the
floor.
I can resend that, if you like?
I guess it'd also make sense to fix the x86 bits at the same time, so
I'm fine with tahat being folded with other fixes.
> I'm really tired of all this featuritis crammed into the code without much
> thought. Dammit, can we please stop this and clean up the existing mess
> first before duct taping more mess on top of it.
Sorry for adding to the mess here.
Thanks,
Mark.
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=arm64/kasan-atomic
[2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170628124552.GG5981@leverpostej
[3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1489574142-20856-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-28 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1498140468.git.dvyukov@google.com>
[not found] ` <cover.1498140838.git.dvyukov@google.com>
2017-06-22 14:14 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] x86: switch atomic.h to use atomic-instrumented.h Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-22 21:14 ` Andrew Morton
2017-06-23 8:23 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-23 8:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-23 19:00 ` Andrew Morton
2017-06-22 14:14 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] kasan: allow kasan_check_read/write() to accept pointers to volatiles Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-22 14:14 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] asm-generic: add KASAN instrumentation to atomic operations Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-28 10:02 ` [PATCH] locking/atomics: don't alias ____ptr Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-28 10:16 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-28 11:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-28 11:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-28 11:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-28 12:45 ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-28 12:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-28 12:27 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-06-28 13:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-28 11:15 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2017-06-28 12:12 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2017-06-28 13:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-28 13:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-28 14:14 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-06-28 15:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-28 15:54 ` Mark Rutland
2017-06-28 16:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-28 18:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-29 6:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-06-28 14:00 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2017-06-22 14:14 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] asm-generic, x86: add comments for atomic instrumentation Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170628141420.GK5981@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox