From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] xfs: map KM_MAYFAIL to __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:06:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170627140654.GO28072@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170627134751.GA28043@infradead.org>
On Tue 27-06-17 06:47:51, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:49:50AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Christoph, Darrick
> > could you have a look at this patch please? Andrew has put it into mmotm
> > but I definitely do not want it passes your attention.
>
> I don't think what we have to gain from it. Callsite for KM_MAYFAIL
> should handler failures, but the current behavior seems to be doing fine
> too.
Last time I've asked I didnd't get any reply so let me ask again. Some
of those allocations seem to be small (e.g. by a random look
xlog_cil_init allocates struct xfs_cil which is 576B and struct
xfs_cil_ctx 176B). Those do not fail currently under most conditions and
it will retry allocation with the OOM killer if there is no progress. As
you know that failing those is acceptable, wouldn't it be better to
simply fail them and do not disrupt the system with the oom killer?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-27 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-23 8:53 [PATCH 0/6] mm: give __GFP_REPEAT a better semantic Michal Hocko
2017-06-23 8:53 ` [PATCH 1/6] MIPS: do not use __GFP_REPEAT for order-0 request Michal Hocko
2017-06-23 10:27 ` Ralf Baechle
2017-06-26 9:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-06-23 8:53 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm, tree wide: replace __GFP_REPEAT by __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL with more useful semantic Michal Hocko
2017-06-26 11:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-06-26 12:14 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-26 12:17 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-06-26 12:38 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-26 12:42 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-26 11:53 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-06-23 8:53 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: map KM_MAYFAIL to __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL Michal Hocko
2017-06-27 8:49 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-27 13:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-27 14:06 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-06-28 4:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-23 8:53 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm: kvmalloc support __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL for all sizes Michal Hocko
2017-06-26 12:00 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-06-26 12:18 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-23 8:53 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: use __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL Michal Hocko
2017-06-23 8:53 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm, migration: do not trigger OOM killer when migrating memory Michal Hocko
2017-06-23 20:43 ` Andrew Morton
2017-06-26 5:28 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-26 12:13 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170627140654.GO28072@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox