linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: rientjes@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, oom: prevent additional oom kills before memory is freed
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:13:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170615121315.GK1486@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170615120335.GJ1486@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Thu 15-06-17 14:03:35, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 15-06-17 20:32:39, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > > An alternative would be to allow reaping and exit_mmap race. The unmap
> > > part should just work I guess. We just have to be careful to not race
> > > with free_pgtables and that shouldn't be too hard to implement (e.g.
> > > (ab)use mmap_sem for write there). I haven't thought that through
> > > completely though so I might miss something of course.
> > 
> > I think below one is simpler.
> [...]
> > @@ -556,25 +553,21 @@ static void oom_reap_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
> >  	struct mm_struct *mm = tsk->signal->oom_mm;
> >  
> >  	/* Retry the down_read_trylock(mmap_sem) a few times */
> > -	while (attempts++ < MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES && !__oom_reap_task_mm(tsk, mm))
> > +	while (__oom_reap_task_mm(tsk, mm), !test_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags)
> > +	       && attempts++ < MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES)
> >  		schedule_timeout_idle(HZ/10);
> >  
> > -	if (attempts <= MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES)
> > -		goto done;
> > -
> > -
> > -	pr_info("oom_reaper: unable to reap pid:%d (%s)\n",
> > -		task_pid_nr(tsk), tsk->comm);
> > -	debug_show_all_locks();
> > -
> > -done:
> > -	tsk->oom_reaper_list = NULL;
> > -
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Hide this mm from OOM killer because it has been either reaped or
> >  	 * somebody can't call up_write(mmap_sem).
> >  	 */
> > -	set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
> > +	if (!test_and_set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags)) {
> > +		pr_info("oom_reaper: unable to reap pid:%d (%s)\n",
> > +			task_pid_nr(tsk), tsk->comm);
> > +		debug_show_all_locks();
> > +	}
> > +
> 
> How does this _solve_ anything? Why would you even retry when you
> _know_ that the reference count dropped to zero. It will never
> increment. So the above is basically just schedule_timeout_idle(HZ/10) *
> MAX_OOM_REAP_RETRIES before we set MMF_OOM_SKIP.

Just to make myself more clear. The above assumes that the victim hasn't
passed exit_mmap and MMF_OOM_SKIP in __mmput. Which is the case we want to
address here.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-15 12:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-14 23:43 David Rientjes
2017-06-15 10:39 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-15 10:53   ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-15 11:01     ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-15 11:32       ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-15 12:03         ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-15 12:13           ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-06-15 13:01             ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-15 13:22               ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-15 21:43                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-15 21:37               ` David Rientjes
2017-06-15 12:20       ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-15 21:26   ` David Rientjes
2017-06-15 21:41     ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-15 22:03       ` David Rientjes
2017-06-15 22:12         ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-15 22:42           ` David Rientjes
2017-06-16  8:06             ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-16  0:54           ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-16  4:00             ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-16  8:39             ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-16 10:27               ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-16 11:02                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-16 14:26                   ` Re: [patch] mm, oom: prevent additional oom kills before memoryis freed Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-16 14:42                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-17 13:30                       ` Re: [patch] mm, oom: prevent additional oom kills before memory is freed Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-23 12:38                         ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-16 12:22       ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-16 14:12         ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-17  5:17           ` [PATCH] mm,oom_kill: Close race window of needlessly selecting new victims Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-20 22:12             ` David Rientjes
2017-06-21  2:17               ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-21 20:31                 ` David Rientjes
2017-06-22  0:53                   ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-06-23 12:45                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-21 13:18               ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170615121315.GK1486@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox