From: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
To: keescook@chromium.org, mhocko@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org
Cc: penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com,
sds@tycho.nsa.gov, casey@schaufler-ca.com, hch@infradead.org,
labbott@redhat.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] Make LSM Writable Hooks a command line option
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 15:35:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170607123505.16629-5-igor.stoppa@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170607123505.16629-1-igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
This patch shows how it is possible to take advantage of pmalloc:
instead of using the build-time option __lsm_ro_after_init, to decide if
it is possible to keep the hooks modifiable, now this becomes a
boot-time decision, based on the kernel command line.
This patch relies on:
"Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list_head"
Author: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
to break free from the static constraint imposed by the previous
hardening model, based on __ro_after_init.
The default value is disabled, unless SE Linux debugging is turned on.
Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
CC: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
---
security/security.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index c492f68..9b8b478 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <linux/personality.h>
#include <linux/backing-dev.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/pmalloc.h>
#include <net/flow.h>
#define MAX_LSM_EVM_XATTR 2
@@ -33,8 +34,17 @@
/* Maximum number of letters for an LSM name string */
#define SECURITY_NAME_MAX 10
-static struct list_head hook_heads[LSM_MAX_HOOK_INDEX]
- __lsm_ro_after_init;
+static int dynamic_lsm = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE);
+
+static __init int set_dynamic_lsm(char *str)
+{
+ get_option(&str, &dynamic_lsm);
+ return 0;
+}
+early_param("dynamic_lsm", set_dynamic_lsm);
+
+static struct list_head *hook_heads;
+static struct pmalloc_pool *sec_pool;
char *lsm_names;
/* Boot-time LSM user choice */
static __initdata char chosen_lsm[SECURITY_NAME_MAX + 1] =
@@ -59,6 +69,11 @@ int __init security_init(void)
{
enum security_hook_index i;
+ sec_pool = pmalloc_create_pool("security");
+ BUG_ON(!sec_pool);
+ hook_heads = pmalloc(sizeof(struct list_head) * LSM_MAX_HOOK_INDEX,
+ sec_pool);
+ BUG_ON(!hook_heads);
for (i = 0; i < LSM_MAX_HOOK_INDEX; i++)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hook_heads[i]);
pr_info("Security Framework initialized\n");
@@ -74,7 +89,8 @@ int __init security_init(void)
* Load all the remaining security modules.
*/
do_security_initcalls();
-
+ if (!dynamic_lsm)
+ pmalloc_protect_pool(sec_pool);
return 0;
}
--
2.9.3
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-07 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-07 12:35 [PATCH v6 0/4] ro protection for dynamic data Igor Stoppa
2017-06-07 12:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list_head Igor Stoppa
2017-06-07 12:35 ` [PATCH 2/4] Protectable Memory Allocator Igor Stoppa
2017-06-09 18:56 ` Laura Abbott
2017-06-19 7:12 ` Igor Stoppa
2017-06-07 12:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] Protectable Memory Allocator - Debug interface Igor Stoppa
2017-06-07 12:35 ` Igor Stoppa [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-06-06 18:24 [RFC v5 PATCH 0/4] NOT FOR MERGE - ro protection for dynamic data Igor Stoppa
2017-06-06 18:24 ` [PATCH 4/4] Make LSM Writable Hooks a command line option Igor Stoppa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170607123505.16629-5-igor.stoppa@huawei.com \
--to=igor.stoppa@huawei.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox