From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>,
qiuxishi@huawei.com, Kani Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@hpe.com>,
slaoub@gmail.com, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, memory_hotplug: support movable_node for hotplugable nodes
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 10:13:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170605081306.GH9248@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170601122004.32732-1-mhocko@kernel.org>
Are there any further comments? Can I post this for merging? I will
update the documentation as well.
On Thu 01-06-17 14:20:04, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
> movable_node kernel parameter allows to make hotplugable NUMA
> nodes to put all the hotplugable memory into movable zone which
> allows more or less reliable memory hotremove. At least this
> is the case for the NUMA nodes present during the boot (see
> find_zone_movable_pfns_for_nodes).
>
> This is not the case for the memory hotplug, though.
>
> echo online > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXYZ/status
>
> will default to a kernel zone (usually ZONE_NORMAL) unless the
> particular memblock is already in the movable zone range which is not
> the case normally when onlining the memory from the udev rule context
> for a freshly hotadded NUMA node. The only option currently is to have a
> special udev rule to echo online_movable to all memblocks belonging to
> such a node which is rather clumsy. Not the mention this is inconsistent
> as well because what ended up in the movable zone during the boot will
> end up in a kernel zone after hotremove & hotadd without special care.
>
> It would be nice to reuse memblock_is_hotpluggable but the runtime
> hotplug doesn't have that information available because the boot and
> hotplug paths are not shared and it would be really non trivial to
> make them use the same code path because the runtime hotplug doesn't
> play with the memblock allocator at all.
>
> Teach move_pfn_range that MMOP_ONLINE_KEEP can use the movable zone if
> movable_node is enabled and the range doesn't overlap with the existing
> normal zone. This should provide a reasonable default onlining strategy.
>
> Strictly speaking the semantic is not identical with the boot time
> initialization because find_zone_movable_pfns_for_nodes covers only the
> hotplugable range as described by the BIOS/FW. From my experience this
> is usually a full node though (except for Node0 which is special and
> never goes away completely). If this turns out to be a problem in the
> real life we can tweak the code to store hotplug flag into memblocks
> but let's keep this simple now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
>
> Hi,
> I am sending this as an RFC because this is a user visible change change
> of behavior, strictly speaking. I believe it is a desirable change of
> behavior, thought, and it an explicit opt-in (kernel parameter) is
> required to see the change so I do not expect any breakage. I would
> still like to hear what other people think about this shift. I have
> tested it on a memory hotplug capable HW where the whole numa node can
> be hotremove/added.
>
> Does anybody see any problem with the proposed semantic?
>
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index b98fb0b3ae11..74d75583736c 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -943,6 +943,19 @@ struct zone *default_zone_for_pfn(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
> return &pgdat->node_zones[ZONE_NORMAL];
> }
>
> +static inline bool movable_pfn_range(int nid, struct zone *default_zone,
> + unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> +{
> + if (!allow_online_pfn_range(nid, start_pfn, nr_pages,
> + MMOP_ONLINE_KERNEL))
> + return true;
> +
> + if (!movable_node_is_enabled())
> + return false;
> +
> + return !zone_intersects(default_zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Associates the given pfn range with the given node and the zone appropriate
> * for the given online type.
> @@ -958,10 +971,10 @@ static struct zone * __meminit move_pfn_range(int online_type, int nid,
> /*
> * MMOP_ONLINE_KEEP defaults to MMOP_ONLINE_KERNEL but use
> * movable zone if that is not possible (e.g. we are within
> - * or past the existing movable zone)
> + * or past the existing movable zone). movable_node overrides
> + * this default and defaults to movable zone
> */
> - if (!allow_online_pfn_range(nid, start_pfn, nr_pages,
> - MMOP_ONLINE_KERNEL))
> + if (movable_pfn_range(nid, zone, start_pfn, nr_pages))
> zone = movable_zone;
> } else if (online_type == MMOP_ONLINE_MOVABLE) {
> zone = &pgdat->node_zones[ZONE_MOVABLE];
> --
> 2.11.0
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-05 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-01 12:20 Michal Hocko
2017-06-01 14:11 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-06-01 14:22 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-01 15:19 ` Reza Arbab
2017-06-01 15:38 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-01 15:47 ` Reza Arbab
2017-06-01 15:52 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-01 16:04 ` Reza Arbab
2017-06-01 16:02 ` Reza Arbab
2017-06-01 16:14 ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-01 16:49 ` Reza Arbab
2017-06-05 8:13 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170605081306.GH9248@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=slaoub@gmail.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox