From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f69.google.com (mail-wm0-f69.google.com [74.125.82.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9FB6B0279 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 09:44:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f69.google.com with SMTP id i77so19765427wmh.10 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 06:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de. [195.135.220.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l1si13201928ede.244.2017.05.30.06.44.58 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 30 May 2017 06:44:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 15:44:55 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: bump PGSTEAL*/PGSCAN*/ALLOCSTALL counters in memcg reclaim Message-ID: <20170530134455.GH7969@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1496062901-21456-1-git-send-email-guro@fb.com> <20170530122436.GE7969@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170530132114.GA28148@castle> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170530132114.GA28148@castle> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Roman Gushchin Cc: Balbir Singh , Johannes Weiner , Vladimir Davydov , kernel-team@fb.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 30-05-17 14:21:14, Roman Gushchin wrote: [...] > But what about PGSTEAL*/PGSCAN* counters, isn't it better to make them > reflect __all__ reclaim activity, no matter what was a root cause? What would be the advantage? Those counters have always been global and we should better have a strong reason to change that. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org