From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@suse.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] x86/mm: Pass flush_tlb_info to flush_tlb_others() etc
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 10:18:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170524081848.dozbpzdbi5syyyx2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3aa98b1199bdcc258706bc8084135b51b52f1ece.1495492063.git.luto@kernel.org>
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
> Rather than passing all the contents of flush_tlb_info to
> flush_tlb_others(), pass a pointer to the structure directly. For
> consistency, this also removes the unnecessary cpu parameter from
> uv_flush_tlb_others() to make its signature match the other
> *flush_tlb_others() functions.
>
> This serves two purposes:
>
> - It will dramatically simplify future patches that change struct
> flush_tlb_info, which I'm planning to do.
>
> - struct flush_tlb_info is an adequate description of what to do
> for a local flush, too, so by reusing it we can remove duplicated
> code between local and remove flushes in a future patch.
>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 6 ++--
> arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 5 ++-
> arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 19 ++++++-----
> arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv.h | 9 ++---
> arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++------------------
> arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c | 10 +++---
> arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 10 +++---
> 7 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
I've picked up the first three patches, but this patch apparently clashes with
v4.12 changes:
patching file arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1109.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1170.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
patching file arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1427.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1440.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1454.
3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
Patch 10 is broken and patch 11 needs an Ack from the KVM guys so I'll wait for a
new series on top of the new x86/mm branch. (Which I'll push out once it passes
testing.)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-24 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-22 22:30 [PATCH v2 00/11] x86 TLB flush cleanups, moving toward PCID support Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] x86/mm: Reimplement flush_tlb_page() using flush_tlb_mm_range() Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] x86/mm: Reduce indentation in flush_tlb_func() Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] x86/mm: Make the batched unmap TLB flush API more generic Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] x86/mm: Pass flush_tlb_info to flush_tlb_others() etc Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-24 8:18 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] x86/mm: Change the leave_mm() condition for local TLB flushes Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] x86/mm: Refactor flush_tlb_mm_range() to merge local and remote cases Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] x86/mm: Use new merged flush logic in arch_tlbbatch_flush() Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] x86/mm: Remove the UP tlbflush code; always use the formerly SMP code Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB to track the actual loaded mm Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] x86/mm: Be more consistent wrt PAGE_SHIFT vs PAGE_SIZE in tlb flush code Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 23:24 ` Nadav Amit
2017-05-22 23:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-05-22 22:30 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] x86,kvm: Teach KVM's VMX code that CR3 isn't a constant Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170524081848.dozbpzdbi5syyyx2@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bpetkov@suse.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox