linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] refine and rename slub sysfs
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 08:39:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170523063911.GC12813@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170523032705.GA4275@WeideMBP.lan>

On Tue 23-05-17 11:27:05, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:06:37AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Wed 17-05-17 22:11:40, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> This patch serial could be divided into two parts.
> >> 
> >> First three patches refine and adds slab sysfs.
> >> Second three patches rename slab sysfs.
> >> 
> >> 1. Refine slab sysfs
> >> 
> >> There are four level slabs:
> >> 
> >>     CPU
> >>     CPU_PARTIAL
> >>     PARTIAL
> >>     FULL
> >> 
> >> And in sysfs, it use show_slab_objects() and cpu_partial_slabs_show() to
> >> reflect the statistics.
> >> 
> >> In patch 2, it splits some function in show_slab_objects() which makes sure
> >> only cpu_partial_slabs_show() covers statistics for CPU_PARTIAL slabs.
> >> 
> >> After doing so, it would be more clear that show_slab_objects() has totally 9
> >> statistic combinations for three level of slabs. Each slab has three cases
> >> statistic.
> >> 
> >>     slabs
> >>     objects
> >>     total_objects
> >> 
> >> And when we look at current implementation, some of them are missing. So patch
> >> 2 & 3 add them up.
> >> 
> >> 2. Rename sysfs
> >> 
> >> The slab statistics in sysfs are
> >> 
> >>     slabs
> >>     objects
> >>     total_objects
> >>     cpu_slabs
> >>     partial
> >>     partial_objects
> >>     cpu_partial_slabs
> >> 
> >> which is a little bit hard for users to understand. The second three patches
> >> rename sysfs file in this pattern.
> >> 
> >>     xxx_slabs[[_total]_objects]
> >> 
> >> Finally it looks Like
> >> 
> >>     slabs
> >>     slabs_objects
> >>     slabs_total_objects
> >>     cpu_slabs
> >>     cpu_slabs_objects
> >>     cpu_slabs_total_objects
> >>     partial_slabs
> >>     partial_slabs_objects
> >>     partial_slabs_total_objects
> >>     cpu_partial_slabs
> >
> >_Why_ do we need all this?
> 
> To have a clear statistics for each slab level.

Is this worth risking breakage of the userspace which consume this data
now? Do you have any user space code which will greatly benefit from the
new data and which couldn't do the same with the current format/output?

If yes this all should be in the changelog.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-23  6:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-17 14:11 Wei Yang
2017-05-17 14:11 ` [PATCH 1/6] mm/slub: add total_objects_partial sysfs Wei Yang
2017-05-17 14:50   ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-17 14:11 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm/slub: not include cpu_partial data in cpu_slabs sysfs Wei Yang
2017-05-17 14:11 ` [PATCH 3/6] mm/slub: add cpu_slabs_[total_]objects sysfs Wei Yang
2017-05-17 14:11 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/slub: rename ALL slabs sysfs Wei Yang
2017-05-17 14:11 ` [PATCH 5/6] mm/slub: rename partial_slabs sysfs Wei Yang
2017-05-17 14:11 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm/slub: rename cpu_partial_slab sysfs Wei Yang
2017-05-17 14:57 ` [PATCH 0/6] refine and rename slub sysfs Christoph Lameter
2017-05-18  9:06 ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-23  3:27   ` Wei Yang
2017-05-23  6:39     ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-05-23 16:07       ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-24  9:54       ` Wei Yang
2017-05-24 12:03         ` Michal Hocko
2017-05-24 15:21           ` Wei Yang
2017-05-24 16:03             ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-25  6:49             ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170523063911.GC12813@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox